this post was submitted on 08 Apr 2025
1172 points (99.3% liked)

News

35749 readers
3693 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

China condemned JD Vance on Tuesday for calling Chinese people “peasants” in a Fox News interview, where he said, “To make it a little more crystal clear, we borrow money from Chinese peasants to buy the things those Chinese peasants manufacture.”

The Chinese Foreign Ministry labeled the remarks “ignorant and disrespectful.”

The backlash exploded on Chinese social media, garnering 140 million Weibo views.

Critics mocked Vance’s own “hillbilly” background and pointed to China’s advanced tech and infrastructure, highlighting rising tensions amid Trump’s trade war.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] kamenlady@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Only Democrats seem to find their act intimidating.

[–] Serinus@lemmy.world 22 points 10 months ago (3 children)

Here it is again, a desperate attempt to blame Democrats.

[–] bassomitron@lemmy.world 12 points 10 months ago (5 children)

They're not blameless. They're not entirely to blame, but they could've regulated social media to dampen disinformation when they had the chance.

[–] Serinus@lemmy.world 9 points 10 months ago

And now that would be the reason they didn't get elected.

[–] peteyestee@feddit.org 5 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

You can't tame the beast anymore. It's in control and it's bigger than governments. It's more of poltergeist than something physical. Humanity is dying and the lifeboats that were government and religion have been overtaken.

This is a whole new war beyond law and order.

Natural law prevails, but many of us have been taught to not live by natural law. In turn we are losing the battle by being submissive to man-made law while the evil side of humanity thrives as it has never followed the law of man. They know the laws are for the poor and easily controlled and not meant for them.

Or something?

[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 1 points 10 months ago

You can't tame the beast anymore

Yes we can. It requires effort, will and risk, though, and these are things Americans lack one of.

[–] AntiOutsideAktion@lemmy.ml 3 points 10 months ago

holy shit these fucking libs

"They should have cracked down on how we're allowed to communicate with each other"

and not

"They shouldn't have committed a genocide" or "They shouldn't have taken tens of millions of people off medicaid and doubled child poverty"

[–] SculptusPoe@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

The answer is never censorship. Look at who would be in charge of your 'regulated' social media now... It would be all of it instead of just the now hyper-regulated X.

[–] bassomitron@lemmy.world 9 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

I didn't say censorship. They could've regulated social media as actual Media outlets, which puts them on the hook for libel lawsuits if blatantly fake disinformation is advertised on their platforms. In other words, they have to follow the same rules as traditional media outlets.

[–] RedditRefugee69@lemmynsfw.com 0 points 10 months ago (1 children)
[–] bassomitron@lemmy.world 7 points 10 months ago (1 children)

You could look into it yourself, but here's a general overview on the US response to disinformation:

https://firstamendment.mtsu.edu/article/disinformation-governance-board/

The Democrats could've been pushing harder to address such a serious problem, but they didn't. And here we are.

Like I said, they're not entirely to blame, but they're not blameless.

[–] RedditRefugee69@lemmynsfw.com 1 points 10 months ago

I was aware of the dangers and am now aware of the cited committee to establish regulations that somehow counter foreign and domestic disinformation without infringing on the First Amendment; I was moreso asking for your personal idea of a regulation that you would put in place if dictator for a day.

[–] eugenevdebs@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 10 months ago (1 children)

"Please stop capitulating to Trump and signing off of his bills, they're fascists and you're enabling them."

"Whats with the blame for Democrats? You must hate them for no reason."

[–] Serinus@lemmy.world -3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

The budget bill? Things were going to be worse if there was a shutdown that hands more power to the executive.

[–] eugenevdebs@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

If they wanted a shutdown, Republicans would have voted no and shut it down.

Instead they voted yes along with 11 Democrats.