Booker: "I confess that I have been imperfect. I confess that I've been inadequate to the moment. I've confess that the Democratic Party has made terrible mistakes that gave a lane to this demagogue. I confess we all must look in the mirror and say 'we will do better.'"
Booker and every other Senator voted unanimously for all of Trump's political appointees. Booker is full of shit.
I think a lot of people on both sides are still living in a weird fantasy bubble that we have "two sides" and they're actually fighting each other.
Yes, some outliers are probably genuine, but we're all getting played if we think this shit isn't designed to make a select group of people wealthy no matter who wins or who speaks out or what the political landscape looks like. You don't leave trillions of dollars up to chance and the votes of uninformed or uninterested voters.
The first sentence is true, the second sentence maybe but I don't know. That's why I am saying this is the first sign of resistance in the chamber, because up til now it was a lot of humming and hawing about how bad this is but otherwise nodding along as if it was business as usual, but this could be one of a future series of acts of resistance. It's easy to write off all Democratic senators, but this is the first tangible delay to the Republican majority's business. He brought to the spotlight many important messages in front of many people, about taxing the rich, giving affordable healthcare etc. (unlike Ted Cruz's timewaster filibuster that was reading Green Eggs and Ham and stuff).
So many people seem to miss the point. Booker essentially became a streamer for a day except with usually boring Senate stuff, and was able to get at least a few people energized about important topics on how to resist Trump and cause "good trouble". He pushed his health and stamina to an admirable extent for a politician. It's far more newsworthy than Democrats waving little handboards around.
I get what you're saying but to me this act seems completely consistent with the standard Democrat mo of not taking action when it really matters, while acting when it doesn't. The mo that creates the impression of doing things by only doing an insufficient amount. Case in point - Booker's action did not take place a week ago during the CR vote. Doing it then would have really mattered. If it did, I'd have been shocked. We discussed this with some friends when the rumor came down that Chuck is going to vote for the bill. So now I can't shake the feeling this act is just meant to paper over that inaction which got many Democrat voters very angry at the party.
Democrats in Congress are experts at snatching defeat from the jaws of victory, I get it. But what the senator did is something that would inspire individuals to organize into groups to put more pressure on the administration and its allies. Booker put a part of himself on the line, got his message out there.
After this is the part where the Democratic minority of the Senate, conceivably, will fail to follow through and organizing together and amongst their constituents and putting pressure on red state senators. At least I heard Booker was doing something along those lines in NJ this weekend. If they can force a 60%-80% productive work week in the Republican Senate that is something.
Democrats lose and fail on purpose. If they ever get a clear majority, they have a problem. How do they explain why they aren't getting us healthcare and human rights when the GOP is powerless? They can't. The mask would be completely off. So, instead they lose and then beg for money from idiots.