Funny

13152 readers

411 users here now

General rules:

Be kind.
All posts must make an attempt to be funny.
Obey the general sh.itjust.works instance rules.
No politics or political figures. There are plenty of other politics communities to choose from.
Don't post anything grotesque or potentially illegal. Examples include pornography, gore, animal cruelty, inappropriate jokes involving kids, etc.

Exceptions may be made at the discretion of the mods.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

TheDude@sh.itjust.works

kersploosh@sh.itjust.works

example@reddthat.com

VicksVaporBBQrub@sh.itjust.works

622

Choose wisely (lemmy.world)

submitted 10 months ago by The_Picard_Maneuver@lemmy.world to c/funny@sh.itjust.works

208 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 7 points 10 months ago (2 children)

It could be interpreted as number of major orifices a person has not including eurethra.

[–] KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 10 months ago (1 children)

possibly, but that would be way too complicated for signage like this, it seems like this is actually just stall numbering inside of a gendered bathroom as per another post in the thread though.

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

No matter what the signs indicate it is already overcomplicated.

[–] KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 10 months ago

yeah, it's definitely silly.

[–] Trainguyrom@reddthat.com 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Let's see 2 nostrils...2 ears...mouth.. oh shit

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

We have differing opinions of the word Major.

[–] dnick@sh.itjust.works 0 points 10 months ago

Well the fact that you thought it necessary to qualify whether the urethra counted as 'major' kind of highlights how non-obvious that terminology is in this case.