this post was submitted on 22 Mar 2025
883 points (98.4% liked)

politics

22247 readers
5622 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Keep it going. Canada, you're doing great.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] draenog@lemmy.world 29 points 3 days ago (1 children)

You left out "Incredibly high P/E"

[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 days ago

What I love is that it's a damned if you do, damned if you don't situation.

The whole reason it has such an absurd valuation, 20x higher than a normal car company, is that they convinced investors they weren't just a boring car company. They had a visionary CEO who was going to keep innovating and growing the company in ways that normal car companies could never replicate. He was Tony Stark! Now they're in a situation where it's that same CEO who's dragging them down. His politics is tanking their reputation, so it's tanking their stock value.

The problem is, if they dump him as CEO, there's absolutely no way to justify the absurd P/E ratio. They can't just go out and appoint another supposed "Tony Stark" to run the company. That means they stick with him and their stock price tanks because he's one of the most hated people in the world. Or, they ditch him and their stock price tanks because with their visionary CEO gone, the jig is up and there's clearly no way to justify a P/E ratio of 100 when Toyota has a P/E ratio of approximately 7.

And for Elon, half his wealth is Tesla stock, and he borrowed against that Tesla stock to fund his Twitter purchase. If Tesla tanks, it all could come crashing down around him. There's no escape for him either. He can't realistically even sell his stock because as soon as he started trying to do that it would signal his lack of confidence and cause the value to plummet.

It's just annoying that Tesla's stock isn't crashing faster. So many people who don't believe in the sunk cost fallacy, and are desperately lying to themselves rather than cashing out before the bubble bursts.