this post was submitted on 14 Mar 2025
458 points (99.1% liked)

Economics

921 readers
62 users here now

founded 2 years ago
458
U.S. stock market loses $5 trillion in value in three weeks (www.cnbc.com)
submitted 4 months ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/economics@lemmy.world
56 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Summary

The U.S. stock market has lost over $5 trillion in value in three weeks as the S&P 500 fell 10% from its record high.

The decline, driven by concerns over Trump’s trade policies and slowing economic growth, has led to weaker consumer sentiment and cautious corporate outlooks.

Barclays strategist Emmanuel Cau noted rising uncertainty among investors.

The selloff has also hit AI-related stocks, with Nvidia down 17% and the Magnificent Seven ETF falling 16%.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] faberyayo@lemm.ee 10 points 4 months ago (2 children)

For those who need it; don't sell. It will be okay, just wait it out.

[–] RizzoTheSmall@lemm.ee 10 points 4 months ago (2 children)

If anything it's a good time to buy. It's still 100% up over 5 years.

[–] jbk@discuss.tchncs.de 10 points 4 months ago

i predict way more blunders going forward by the two daddies of the usa…

[–] faberyayo@lemm.ee 1 points 4 months ago

Agree. Unfortunately, I'm already 95% in market.

[–] Jhex@lemmy.world 9 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Will it be ok? Will people around the world just go back buying american after Trump folds?

[–] faberyayo@lemm.ee 6 points 4 months ago (2 children)

The markets don't necessary react to people boycotting US products at the moment. It's more the uncertainty with the tariffs and other decisions from Washington.

[–] SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca 3 points 4 months ago

So it's a bet that Trump will someday have stable economic policies. How much money are you betting on that?

[–] Jhex@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago

They will when they lose international markets and all their supply chains that are not entirely in the USA charge them the "we need to price in your bipolar president risk" fees