this post was submitted on 10 Mar 2025
-36 points (5.0% liked)

Conservative

518 readers
93 users here now

A place to discuss pro-conservative stuff

  1. Be excellent to each other. Civility, No Racism, No Bigotry, No Slurs, No calls to violences, No namecalling, All that good stuff, follow lemm.ee's rules, follow the rules of your instance, etc.

  2. We are a Pro-Conservative forum. Posts must have a clear pro-conservative, or anti left-wing bias. We are interested in promoting conservatism and discussing things that might get ignored elsewhere. All sources are acceptable, however reputable sources with a reputation for factual reporting are preferred.

  3. Dissent is allowed in the comments, but try to be constructive; if you do not agree, then provide a reason which is backed up by references or a reasonable alternative interpretation of the provided facts. That means the left wing is welcome to state their opinions, but please keep it in good faith.

A polite request, not a rule, if you feel the need to report a comment, please don't reply to it.

founded 1 year ago
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] andMoonsValue@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago (3 children)

I'm sorry that you feel that way. If you're uncomfortable giving your opinion I can give mine and see if we have any middle ground. From my perspective, DOGE is an attempt to repeat what was done to Twitter on a much larger scale. The U.S economy is crashing hard as a result. I'm legitimately concerned the damage DOGE has done to the U.S government will be permanent. The cutting of research and government programs at this level will have lasting impacts that will reduce the quality of life of Americans for generations. I can elaborate further if you want. I understand others gut reactions to down vote your comments and your posts when they disagree but this is a conservative community. I'm clearly not conservative but respect that people have other political views. Perhaps I'm an optimist but I think if platforms like Lemmy don't allow those on the other side of political spectrum to have conversations then it pushes people into their own echo chambers further polarizing the individual. I hope you feel more comfortable to share your personal opinion on what is happening in future. Given how extreme it is, I think its necessary to really understand what is happening.

[–] barrygoldwater@lemmy.wtf -1 points 6 hours ago

There have been lots of new comments since you posted. Please refresh the thread and you will see exactly what I was talking about. This thread is a mess of negativity now! lol

[–] aubeynarf@lemmynsfw.com 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

OP is one of the most prolific posters here, operating several accounts and sometimes posting 50+ times a day.

His salient trait is that he wants to control the narrative by queue flooding but claim “it’s just an article, I didn’t write it and have no opinion”.

The reason he feels attacked is because he made an absolute ass of himself and his inauthentic behavior became very obvious and got called out over and over again (this is when he was a staunch Socialist supporting Jill Stein)

[–] barrygoldwater@lemmy.wtf 0 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago) (1 children)

OP is one of the most prolific posters here, operating several accounts and sometimes posting 50+ times a day.

What? This is my only account. And I don't post 50 times a day. Feel free to check my post history.

The reason he feels attacked is because he made an absolute ass of himself and his inauthentic behavior became very obvious and got called out over and over again (this is when he was a staunch Socialist supporting Jill Stein)

I'm not feeling attacked at all. What is going on with you? What are you even talking about? I've never made an ass of myself and I stand by everything I've said on Lemmy.

I'm also not a socialist and I don't support Jill Stein. You sound like someone who's having a stroke.

Was that comment meant for me?! Because nothing you are saying has anything to do with me. What "inauthentic behavior" are you talking about???

You're actually proving my point about Lemmy posters who take things too seriously, get obsessed, and go around accusing others and trying to cancel anyone who doesn't agree with them.

So thank you for showing the poster EXACTLY what I was talking about.

[–] WrenFeathers@lemmy.world 0 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

It’s pretty evident to many people across lemmy who you are, and what you’re doing. The commonalities are far too similar for there to be any coincidence involved.

[–] SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world -1 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Is this Barry Goldwater or Donald J Musk?

[–] WrenFeathers@lemmy.world 0 points 7 hours ago
[–] andMoonsValue@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (4 children)

I guess I didn't realize that he floods these communities....

I was just struck by a conservation I had with a family member recently that made me want to start commenting on these communities. I was telling the family member about Lemmy/Mastodon and urged them to join but they said their "crowd" was on X. I did realize certain articles posted to conservative communities get down voted to oblivion while the same article on a news community will get hundreds of up votes.

I want the fediverse to be open to all even those with differing opinions...

What makes you think OP is operating several accounts? Why flood such dead communities?

[–] SeanBrently@lemm.ee 2 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

This isn't about having a different opinion though, if that were the case then the people who hold these "opinions" could at least occasionally back them up with a reason, or some ideological framework from which these opinions are produced. But there never seems to be any actual reasoning behind these various opinions. The card says moops

[–] barrygoldwater@lemmy.wtf -1 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (1 children)

I don't write the articles and there is no Lemmy rule that I have to "back up" something just because I post a link to an article.

[–] SeanBrently@lemm.ee 2 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

I wasn't talking about you specifically, but you're absolutely right, you don't have to justify anything.

At the same time, there is no lemmy rule that people can't ask you why did you post this article? Do you agree/disagree? Is this your opinion and if so how do you come to that conclusion?

And if you can't or won't answer, if you don't discuss topics you bring up in a discussion area, then people are going to conclude you're not actually here to "express your opinion", but for some other reason.

[–] barrygoldwater@lemmy.wtf 0 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

I wasn’t talking about you specifically,

Ahh, ok, my apologies.

At the same time, there is no lemmy rule that people can’t ask you why did you post this article?

Of course people can ask. Just don't expect it. Because there are many many people that post articles who don't discuss them at all.

And if you can’t or won’t answer, if you don’t discuss topics you bring up in a discussion area, then people are going to conclude you’re not actually here to “express your opinion”, but for some other reason.

This is a conservative news community, for conservative news articles. Please read the sidebar.

[–] SeanBrently@lemm.ee 2 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

there are many many people that post articles who don't discuss them at all.

Yea, that's why I wasn't talking about you specifically.

This is a conservative news community, for conservative news articles. Please read the sidebar

Exactly. The card says moops.

But I did read the sidebar and the first thing it says is that this is a place for discussion. So if a whole buncha ppl coming here and dropping off "news articles" with no discussion whatsoever, what else am I supposed to think but that these are propaganda bombs meant to disrupt reality and push a false alt-right nazi narrative? Cuz that's what it looks like.

[–] barrygoldwater@lemmy.wtf -1 points 6 hours ago

The card says moops.

Not sure what that means. Is that a Lemmy acronym?

o if a whole buncha ppl coming here and dropping off “news articles” with no discussion whatsoever, what else am I supposed to think but that these are propaganda bombs meant to disrupt reality and push a false alt-right nazi narrative?

But it's a conservative news community. Were you surprised to find conservative news articles in a conservative news community? I don't understand your issue.

I don't feel like having a deep political discussion. If you do, cool. But find someone else to do that with you. I'm not the guy.

How would it be "propaganda" if it's confined to a conservative news community on Lemmy?!

[–] WrenFeathers@lemmy.world 0 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

They are very well known across many instances for using multiple accounts to bait-troll people into saying things they can then report them for.

They also harass via PM.

[–] barrygoldwater@lemmy.wtf -1 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

They also harass via PM.

What?! Do you have proof of this? At all? No. Because I have never harrassed over PM nor have I even sent a PM on Lemmy.

Please post any proof you have on this.

[–] barrygoldwater@lemmy.wtf -1 points 7 hours ago

I guess I didn’t realize that he floods these communities…

I don't. And that posters crazed response was what I'm talking about. Many posters on Lemmy get so enraged coming across a different political opinion that they start pointing the finger and anyone who disagrees with them and makes up some grand conspiracy of vast spy operations, multiple accounts, bots, etc. It's fucking weird! lmao

Feel free to look at my post history. It's public. I don't post 50 times a day. I legit have no idea what that poster is going on about. It's great that they proved my example to you about people like that though. Now you know...lol

I did realize certain articles posted to conservative communities get down voted to oblivion while the same article on a news community will get hundreds of up votes.

Yep. I have been banned from communities just because I post in this community. I've had science articles from AP News downvoted simply because they look at my post history and see that I have posted links to conservative articles. It's crazy.

But don't let that turn you off of Lemmy. I love Lemmy and I'll never leave. But many here can be um, pretty passionate, about things and actually stalk your posts. lol

What makes you think OP is operating several accounts? Why flood such dead communities?

I asked that poster the same thing. Not only that, but I'm posting conservatie articles to conservative communties. How is that "flooding" Lemmy?!

Not only that, you can just "block" a community and you'll never see the posts there. So why doesn't that poster just block conservative communities?! I've never posted my articles to a community that didn't fit the communities theme/guidelines.

Again, don't let postes like that turn you off of Lemmy. You can also just block individual posters and never see their posts as well.

The only way people like that are seeing my articles is by purposely not blocking me or conservative-themed communities.

They seem to like to be upset. Very strange.

[–] aubeynarf@lemmynsfw.com 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

His interaction and writing style is easy to recognize, under a previous username he boasted about having dozens of accounts and using them to flood/control narratives, and he posts literally identical links seconds apart under different accounts - easy to correlate.

[–] Majorllama@lemmy.world 1 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

So if I am understanding your logic correctly you believe this is the same guy behind this account as "many others". And your proof is that they have the same writing style?

I'm sorry but I don't think that's gonna hold up in a court of law. Good luck with that lmao.

[–] barrygoldwater@lemmy.wtf -1 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

Thank you! I was reading that posters comments and was just scratching my head trying to find out what I posted that they misunderstood. I felt like I was watching them have a totally different conversation than what I was seeing in the thread. So I don't know if they are talking about posts on here that I can't see because of blocking or whatever.

But yikes. What the heck? Same writing style? What does that even mean? lol

They said multiple accounts with exact same links, but when I posted the article here, there was no mention that it's has been posted here before, so I'm totally confused. lol Are there multiple copies of the same articles here by different posters?! I'm not seeing that. Maybe I have some instance blocked or something?

[–] barrygoldwater@lemmy.wtf -1 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago) (1 children)

What are you talking about?! None of that is true.

You need to stop taking Lemmy so seriously.

And why are you even in a conservative community if you are so against me posting stuff here?!

If you keep accusing me of having multiple accounts, I'll start to report your posts. You are off topic and should be discussing the articles.

And for the record, even tho I DON'T have multiple accounts, there is nothing on Lemmy that says it's against the rules to have as many accounts as you want.

[–] aubeynarf@lemmynsfw.com 0 points 6 hours ago
[–] barrygoldwater@lemmy.wtf -3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Meh, if what he is doing is so bad, and enough people think that, then in four years vote in a dem who can change it all back.

[–] andMoonsValue@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I get what you're saying but at the same time, it is much easier to tear things down then build them up. If you fire everyone that manages social security for example, it will be very difficult/costly to train up all new people. This isn't some policy that can just be reversed and that's the end of it. I'll reiterate, I truly think think the damage being done will lower the standard of living for Americans for generations to come and that really saddens me.

[–] barrygoldwater@lemmy.wtf -1 points 7 hours ago

If you fire everyone that manages social security for example, it will be very difficult/costly to train up all new people.

I'm sure they can be trained pretty quickly. Just like any job that has to hire new people.