this post was submitted on 09 Mar 2025
661 points (99.8% liked)

politics

21089 readers
3958 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

More than 10,000 people turned out for a rally with U.S. Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt), in Warren as part of his national “Fighting Oligarchy” tour.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] notsoshaihulud@lemmy.world 42 points 16 hours ago (5 children)

It's interesting to watch this, and while Bernie is slightly left to my values, how come this octogenarian gets it and the rest of the party doesn't? I'm just amazed that some democrats interpret this as "let's align with MAGA" a little more, instead of calling those "right wing radicalists". The future of Dems is to be the anti-oligarchy party. While I understand how risky this may be as unlimited dark money pouring in can tilt things, but people still have the power if they unite.

[–] HighFructoseLowStand@lemm.ee 3 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

One third of Americans voted for Donald Trump. One third of Americans did not vote.

Two thirds of Americans a) think that Kamala Harris, forget Bernie Sanders, was too conservative, or b) do not give a fuck.

The idea that there is this massive left wing sentiment that will bubble to the surface if the Democrats annouce their Five Year Plan simply isn't something born out by the numbers.

[–] notsoshaihulud@lemmy.world 3 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

affordable education and universal healthcare would be popular drawing forces.

[–] HighFructoseLowStand@lemm.ee 0 points 2 hours ago

You mean two essential parts of the Democratic platform for decades?

One of which Biden tried to implement by executive order, but was blocked by the Supreme Court?

[–] krakenfury@lemmy.sdf.org 14 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

No fucking way anti-oligarchy is the future of the party. The Dems are going to run the same tired playbook of courting the center and hoping the Republicans shit the bed. They are already saying this loudly and often.

[–] notsoshaihulud@lemmy.world 4 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

No fucking way anti-oligarchy is the future of the party.

We'll see. It would be quite tragicomical after they just got punished for moving towards the center like the second humiliating time around. At least Bernie's showing the path.

[–] WarlordSdocy@lemmy.world 2 points 5 hours ago

I mean I'm pretty sure a bit ago I saw something that leaked from a meeting of Dems about strategy going forward where they were talking about trying to shift more to the right by presenting themselves as more patriotic and pushing for more focus on larger donors rather than lots of small donors which is basically just doubling down on what they just tried. I still have some hope that maybe people get so fed up a Bernie like candidate can win despite major push back from donors and the establishment of the party and shape the party to be more progressive rather than allowing the party apparatus and donors to shape them to be less progressive but if that did happen it would be a bigger upset then what happened with Trump winning and shaping the Republican party into his personal Maga party.

[–] Amnesigenic@lemmy.world 45 points 10 hours ago (4 children)

If Bernie fucking Sanders is too far left for you then you're definitely part of the problem

[–] pinheadednightmare@lemm.ee 18 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Agreed, Sanders only has the working class at heart throughout his career. Is he perfect? Of course not. If you are working class and you think Bernie is bad…. You really need to reconsider who you are and where you stand.

[–] notsoshaihulud@lemmy.world 5 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

nobody called Bernie bad here...

[–] pinheadednightmare@lemm.ee 4 points 9 hours ago

Understood. I was just making a statement.

[–] Mohamed@lemmy.ca 3 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

While too far left could mean this, the op just said "slightly left". Of course, if what you meant is that Bernie Sanders is barely left enough, that anyone to the right of him is the problem, then nvm.

[–] Amnesigenic@lemmy.world 2 points 7 hours ago

The second one

[–] jsomae@lemmy.ml -3 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Here we have somebody being polite and engaging in politics@lemmy.world. I come to this community because I wish to talk to people who are more right-wing than me. Let's not shoo them away please.

[–] Amnesigenic@lemmy.world 6 points 7 hours ago

Just because they're polite doesn't mean they're not wrong, and if they can't handle being told so then your talking with them isn't going to get anything done anyway

[–] MellowYellow13@lemmy.world 9 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

How in the fuck is Bernie too far left for you? America is way too far fucking right wing, that's insane

[–] notsoshaihulud@lemmy.world -2 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

America is way too far fucking right wing, that’s insane

It generally is, especially from the European perspective but not entirely. If we put aside present republican posturing, the USA is very immigration-friendly right and left whereas in Europe the right wing is extremely against any kind of immigration.

How in the fuck is Bernie too far left for you?

You guys are way too inclined to think in extremes. Slight = difference between democratic socialist vs. social democrat.

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 12 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Bernie is a social democrat, regardless of branding. You're gonna need to specify where Bernie is to your left.

[–] notsoshaihulud@lemmy.world -4 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

The democratic socialist is a label Bernie used to describe himself in the past. I'm not into populism, and consider that social welfare policies only work in a lasting way if people value and respect them, and some of that come with compromises that society has to reach a consensus on.

Also, I don't "need to specify" anything to you and if y'all think that you can afford to attack people for being slightly misaligned with your values don't be surprised about failing to build a movement.

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 10 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago) (1 children)

I didn't attack you? I just asked for clarification! As far as I'm concerned he's a social democrat, just like you, and I don't really know what your disagreement with Bernie even is. I guess you're not into "populism" but what does that mean? You're not into popular policies? What does it mean to "value and respect" social welfare? Does Bernie not value and respect social welfare? I'd like some specifics so we can have a dialogue.

How am I even supposed to talk to you if you refuse to clarify your specific problems?

[–] wewbull@feddit.uk 19 points 14 hours ago

It's interesting to watch this, and while Bernie is slightly left to my values, how come this octogenarian gets it and the rest of the party doesn't?

Which party? The Democrats? He's not part of them since they crushed him and his followers in 2016, preferring to back H.Clinton to a stunning loss against Trump.

They don't get it because they are also a party more interested in supporting oligarchs than the working person. They still think that Trump beat them through disinformation, when it was really that they lost because their track record since Carter has been to back big business over the needs of the common people. Clinton and Obama should have been ripping up Regan's / Bush's legacy, but they just tweaked it. All Trump did was speak to that, even though he had no intention of doing anything about it.