Privacy

1531 readers

255 users here now

Icon base by Lorc under CC BY 3.0 with modifications to add a gradient

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

Ategon@programming.dev

danielintempesta@programming.dev

[Meta] Should we consolidate this community with !privacy@lemmy.dbzer0.com ? (lemmy.zip)

submitted 1 week ago by Blaze@lemmy.zip to c/privacy@programming.dev

19 comments fedilink hide all child comments

!privacy@lemmy.dbzer0.com has

900 users / day
1.58K users / week
2.86K users / month

This community has

61 users / day
220 users / week
483 users / month

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] jet@hackertalks.com 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I would say they are endorsing it by using it, but lets not split hairs. Not being about to talk about a funding part of many privacy tools is too restrictive for a privacy community.

[–] PhilipTheBucket@ponder.cat 4 points 1 week ago

I would say they are endorsing it by using it

I feel like I just raised a counterexample to this. Like, literally just, in the very short message you're responding to.

Not being about to talk about a funding part of many privacy tools

Again: Misleading. If you want to talk about crypto, fine. Be honest about what you want to do and why you think it's important.