this post was submitted on 21 Feb 2025
1099 points (98.5% liked)

News

35774 readers
2233 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Serinus@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago (2 children)

The Nazis may not get broken in the East without the Americans and the Allies in the West.

We have plenty of things to be Anti-American about right now without trying to cherry pick, and oddly frame WWII.

[–] kandoh@reddthat.com 3 points 11 months ago

The Battle of Stalingrad ended on February 2, 1943, with the surrender of German forces after months of intense fighting, marking a major turning point in World War II.

D-Day occurred on June 6, 1944, marking the Allied invasion of Nazi-occupied France.

Your response to me only makes sense if you think I am saying that the Soviets could have beaten the Nazis on their own with no lend lease program or the British holding out against the Nazis.

Am I saying that? Can you quote one of the sections of my comments that is giving you that impression?

If you would stop getting defensive for no reason and actually read my comments, maybe you'll actually be able to understand what I am saying?

Let me lay it out, as clear as fucking possible for you:

  • Americans provided material support to allies fighting the nazis

  • The goal of this is not to stop fascist ideology, but to keep the status quo maintained in Europe and Asia

  • The Soviets win Stalingrad and begin pushing west. Nazi defeat is all but inevitable.

  • American inaction here would result in a red german and red france. Possibly even red Italy and the overthrowing of Franco's fascist regime in Spain.

  • Americans prioritize victory in Europe over the Pacific, even though the Japanese navy is the bigger threat to them.

Ergo:

  • It's not the defeat of fascism that the Americans were interested in, it was maintaining a status quo and preventing communism from spreading through Europe

THANK YOU AND GOD BLESS THE UNITED STATRS OF AMERICA

[–] edg@lemmy.world 0 points 11 months ago (2 children)

There are several accounts pushing these strange lies about WW2. They don't seem to be bots or Russian accounts but this bullshit has to be coming from people intentionally spreading propaganda and disinformation.

[–] kandoh@reddthat.com 2 points 11 months ago

Sometimes it's okay to discuss things and consider them from a different angle than the one you're used to. It can help give you a new perspective on things. Broadening your understanding of things.

[–] Serinus@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

Does it mean that anonymous social media can't exist without state actors using it to push propaganda?

I also don't want everything I've posted to social media to be attached to my resume when I'm applying for jobs.

I've thought about some kind of system where a trusted actor would have access linking individuals actual names to pseudo-anonymous online identities. But one, that's a stretch. Two, Elon would have downloaded that database first. And three, it doesn't even fully solve the problem. Maybe you can make it a crime to allow foreign individuals to use your verified social media account.

But all that's just spitballing on the bleeding edge of social media. And our government isn't exactly known for being on the bleeding edge of tech.

I do think something like this could be good for the German government in particular.