740

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.crimedad.work/post/12162

Why? Because apparently they need some more incentive to keep units occupied. Also, even though a property might be vacant, there's still imputed rental income there. Its owner is just receiving it in the form of enjoying the unit for himself instead of receiving an actual rent check from a tenant. That imputed rent ought to be taxed like any other income.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] ghost_of_faso2@lemmygrad.ml 30 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

now compare the amount of homeless people in both, also you linked the same article twice

btw now you have edited your article remind me, is russia a socilaist country or a neo-liberal one, like the USA?

you have linked me info of Russian from 2010-present, in what way am I remotely suggesting a capitalist, neo-liberal country is what im adovcating for?

[-] ATQ@lemm.ee -1 points 1 year ago

Homeless in the US - 0.2% of the population.

Homeless in Russia - 3.5% of the population.

Is this going the way you thought it would?

[-] ghost_of_faso2@lemmygrad.ml 28 points 1 year ago

Where did I use modern day capitalist russia to prove my point again?

[-] ATQ@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago

Haha. Ok !lemmygrad 😂🤣😂. Here’s your L. Have a nice day.

[-] ghost_of_faso2@lemmygrad.ml 31 points 1 year ago

mfw countries where the median income is 10% of the USA's can provide more housing for the people living in it, you are so cucked lmao

this post was submitted on 24 Aug 2023
740 points (88.5% liked)

Personal Finance

3766 readers
1 users here now

Learn about budgeting, saving, getting out of debt, credit, investing, and retirement planning. Join our community, read the PF Wiki, and get on top of your finances!

Note: This community is not region centric, so if you are posting anything specific to a certain region, kindly specify that in the title (something like [USA], [EU], [AUS] etc.)

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS