this post was submitted on 15 Feb 2025
1366 points (99.2% liked)

politics

20340 readers
2948 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Sen. Bernie Sanders is touring Iowa and Nebraska to rally against “the oligarchy,” aiming to energize progressives rather than launch a 2028 presidential bid.

At 83, he seeks to shape the Democratic Party’s future, arguing it lost in 2024 by neglecting working-class voters.

He hopes to influence budget battles and the 2026 midterms, targeting GOP lawmakers in battleground districts.

With Democrats lacking clear leadership, Sanders’ prominence and focus on economic inequality could define the party’s direction in the Trump-Musk era.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 139 points 5 days ago (22 children)

AoC has been highly visible in news and media so she's also giving it a go. I think one of our real issues is that leadership wise Jefferies is alright but Shumer is downright depressing.

Over the next two years we'll see a constant push by establishment dems to push out the progressives because centrist politicians on both sides want to keep a pro-corporate status quo.

[–] PrettyFlyForAFatGuy@feddit.uk 66 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (20 children)

AOC is now old enough to run for president. I can see her running in 2028 and getting the grassroots support that Bernie enjoyed.

If anyone can get the youth out to vote she can. they need to focus hard on getting people registered though.

I also really REALLY hope she doesn't campaign with a fucking Cheney

[–] Revan343@lemmy.ca 29 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I also really REALLY hope she doesn't campaign with a fucking Cheney

I thought I saw AOC calling out how bad an idea that was, back when Harris did it, so I don't expect her to make the same mistake

[–] thallamabond@lemmy.world 18 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (6 children)

"I think there's plenty of people that aren't happy about that, and I think that is part of the nature of putting together a coalition," Ocasio-Cortez, who clashed with Cheney when they were both in the House, said.

"I don't love it, but that doesn't mean that we aren't on the same team, and we aren't on the same page when it comes to who is unequivocally the better candidate in order to win the presidential election."

https://www.newsweek.com/aoc-liz-cheney-harris-campaign-trump-1976031

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 22 points 5 days ago (1 children)

AOC is now old enough to run for president.

She was old enough during the last election as well.

[–] PrettyFlyForAFatGuy@feddit.uk 18 points 5 days ago (1 children)

aye, but there were no Democratic primaries in the last election

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 6 points 5 days ago

How about that.

[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 24 points 5 days ago (3 children)

They'll never allow AOC to win, just like they didn't allow Bernie.

[–] Mortoc@lemmy.world 24 points 5 days ago (2 children)

With enough support they won’t have the power to choose. It’s an uphill battle but one that we can win.

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 10 points 5 days ago (4 children)

With enough support they won’t have the power to choose.

If there's no primaries, no amount of support matters.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] untorquer@lemmy.world 4 points 4 days ago

Granted the DNC "changed the rules" but are you forgetting the super-delegates overruling the majority votes in the primaries in 2016?

[–] Kalysta@lemm.ee 6 points 4 days ago

Looking at how shitty the democrats are now, they don’t have the ability to stop her.

She just needs to win the working class. There are far, far more of us than the elitist snobs currently running the show on both sides of the aisle.

[–] ProtecyaTec@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago

In today's political climate, I think that's unfortunately true. It would take some drastic outreach, Obama levels of outreach and more, plus a ton of money to change peoples biases and opinions (again, as of today).

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 11 points 5 days ago (2 children)

So watch them run a pair of old white men, or find another member of the Clinton family that hasn't had a go yet.

[–] kreskin@lemmy.world 7 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Well if we cant get Chelsea Clintin we can tap Hunter Biden right.

On a more serious note though, I would be comfortable with Michelle Obama from the getgo if she ran. I dont think she'd be easily controlled by the party. She had no time for their bullshit even when Obama was leading the party.

[–] untorquer@lemmy.world 4 points 4 days ago

She might be a popular option but she doesn't want the job.

[–] untorquer@lemmy.world 3 points 4 days ago

Kerry/Manchin.

[–] SabinStargem@lemmings.world 4 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I personally would prefer a Bernie/AOC ticket, with Bernie giving a public contract that allows her to have him resigned if his mind starts going. IMO, it would be ideal if we could get 16 years of Bernie/AOC, and more if they can raise worthy successors.

[–] PrettyFlyForAFatGuy@feddit.uk 12 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Bernie will be 87 in 2028. Unfortunately i think Bernies chance at the presidency has been and gone. AOC/Walz would be nice. Walz proved him self to be likable in the Harris campaign but he doesn't have the profile that AOC does despite arguably having more experience

[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 3 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Walz is the "Israel has the right to expand its borders" guy so you'd have to make him keep his mouth shut over Israel, but fair enough.

[–] PrettyFlyForAFatGuy@feddit.uk 3 points 4 days ago

He ticks the old white guy box so the racists and sexists can feel okay voting for them while still being left enough to not be too much of a drag on the resulting administration

load more comments (15 replies)
[–] Veedem@lemmy.world 26 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I was higher on Jeffries until I heard him interviewed by John Stewart. He said a bunch of nothing just like the rest of the party.

AOC’s interview was significantly better.

[–] ikidd@lemmy.world 8 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

From Jon's podcast? Wasn't that a horrible interview? Jon starts put saying "what's the plan instead of just saying you have to get the message out" and Jeffries doubles down on "branding".

Its really disheartening to see that bullshit gaslighting is still the MO of the Democrats going forward. Every word of that interview was more of the same old shit, and unfortunately Jon didn't push back on him at all.

[–] Veedem@lemmy.world 4 points 4 days ago

Yes it was a bad interview hence me saying he said a bunch of nothing.

[–] crusa187@lemmy.ml 21 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Jeffries is horribly corrupt and a total stooge for monied interests. Don’t let his PR team fool you.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (19 replies)