this post was submitted on 13 Feb 2025
154 points (98.1% liked)

Canada

7780 readers
1914 users here now

What's going on Canada?

Related Communities

🍁 Meta

🗺️ Provinces / Territories

🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.

🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer

💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.

💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales

🗣️ Politics

🍁 Social / Culture

Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
otter@lemmy.ca
mp3@lemmy.ca
154
Opinion: The U.S. actually has a huge trade surplus in services – that’s where Canada should hit (www.theglobeandmail.com)
submitted 2 days ago by breakfastmtn@lemmy.ca to c/canada@lemmy.ca
16 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

What ultimately influenced U.S. President Donald Trump’s decision last week to delay the tariffs he planned to impose on Canadian imports was arguably Canada’s announcement of targeted retaliatory tariffs on U.S. exports, strategically designed to affect Republican-leaning states the most. But the measures that may be enough to make Mr. Trump pause may not be enough to make him back off permanently.

. . .

Consequently, unless retaliatory measures pose a significant economic threat to the United States, Mr. Trump is likely to proceed with imposing tariffs on trading partners with which the country has large trade deficits, such as China (US$350-billion), Mexico (US$130.6-billion), Canada (US$100-billion) and the European Union (US$200-billion).

The key challenge for Canada – and other U.S. trading partners – is clear: to design a package of retaliatory tariffs and countermeasures that maximally affect U.S. economic interests. One effective strategy to do so is targeting the U.S.’s massive and rapidly growing service trade surplus.

Archive

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] bayesianbandit@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I think Canada, Mexico, & EU should coordinate so that a tariff on any of us is a tariff on all of us. Hit back dollar for dollar on any tariff affecting any of our economies.

[–] Kelsenellenelvial@lemmy.ca 1 points 20 hours ago

Definitely helps if the EU and elsewhere gets in with us on some things. Coordinate on the things that the US really can’t or would be prohibitive to do locally. Raise prices on those resources that Trump keeps saying they don’t need. Charge Hollywood through the nose to film in popular locations, limit access to core technology patents, or ease up on local copyright/patent legislation that tends to benefit American interests.

It’s tough for Canada alone to win an economic fight against the US, but I think it’s in the best interests of most places to get involved because what’s to say the US won’t just keep expanding their reach as long as it works.