this post was submitted on 08 Feb 2025
455 points (96.5% liked)

Curated Tumblr

4269 readers
11 users here now

For preserving the least toxic and most culturally relevant Tumblr heritage posts.

The best transcribed post each week will be pinned and receive a random bitmap of a trophy superimposed with the author's username and a personalized message. Here are some OCR tools to assist you in your endeavors:

Don't be mean. I promise to do my best to judge that fairly.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] konki@lemmy.one 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)
  • that people always act in their own best interest (they fucking don't)

Totally agree

  • that people can actually choose not to buy the product

This is actually pretty well deacrived by what's called the price elasticity of demand in standard neoclassical models. For things like housing one might say that the demand is very inellastic: A change in price does not affect the quatity demanded.

[โ€“] Banana@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 days ago

Yes exactly. This is why I find it funny when they use two different, yet contradictory reasons to justify the sin tax:

  • it prevents people from using it because they'll choose not to use it (the thing they're addicted to) if it gets too expensive; and,
  • the demand is very inelastic which means the government will make more revenue

When really they're primarily taxing the things poor people are addicted to.

Idk, I'm generalizing, I'm just kind of pointing out how a lot of the supports capitalism rests on are weird little opaque excuses to convince the masses that exploitation is what's best for us

So many economists are stuck in a box of what our society has been, they can't think past our current rules and regulations to what could be, because they think that the rules and trends they learn in school are the only possibility, or that profit must be king.