this post was submitted on 08 Feb 2025
108 points (100.0% liked)

Linux

5927 readers
322 users here now

A community for everything relating to the GNU/Linux operating system

Also check out:

Original icon base courtesy of lewing@isc.tamu.edu and The GIMP

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] RedSnt@feddit.dk 22 points 3 days ago (5 children)

Some of the comments on that article made me realise I'm a bit out of the loop: what makes Asahi linux "woke"?
It is sad though that there is so much drama around linux development. It's easy for me to say this, but I do think it's important that there is a switch to a newer language like Rust away from C eventually.

[–] ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It's dumb culture war bullshit, but instead of revolving around black characters in media, it's about a programming language. While there are legitimate critiques of both Rust and interoperating it with a legacy C codebase like Linux (and some people did in the mailings, even if a bit poorly communicated), It almost always boils down to how memory safety supposed to make development much easier, or the dreaded "Code of Conduct".

The biggest programming language culture warriors are often not even mainline C devs, but Javascript/Python devs that idolize the suffering of system devs. Others are just people who tell you to use Python if you want an "easy and productive" language instead of dealing with programming language jank that was needed in the 70's when RAM was extremely limited.

The anti-CoC crowd barely even codes. At least when Walter Bright and co. started to throw out chud adjacent people from D, it's popularity decline reversed, although it also coincided with other changes in the language governance. It seems like the nazis didn't even code, just were around to push D as a rival to Rust as a memory safe language, even if D's memory safety features are more opt-in in nature (safe by default can be achieved by putting @safe: just after the module declaration).

[–] RedSnt@feddit.dk 2 points 1 day ago

Thanks, this seems like a very thorough description of the situation. My limited understanding of how coding works and has worked through history is like you say "filled with a lot of jank" regarding memory because it was limited but also because compilers weren't as efficient as they are today. So it makes sense that there are purists that believes the only good code is the one where programmers are in total control of every bit of memory themselves instead of leaving anything to automation.

[–] caseyweederman@lemmy.ca 26 points 2 days ago (2 children)
[–] andioop@programming.dev 2 points 17 hours ago

I saw someone saying AI "Apparently AI goes hand in hand with wokeism."

Meanwhile, I've seen quite a few complaints from the types this person dismisses as "woke" about AI. Is there more left-leaning approval from AI than I think there is, and more right-leaning disdain for it than I think there is?

[–] RedSnt@feddit.dk 9 points 2 days ago

Classic. But yeah, that's how I'm reading the situation as well.

[–] Deebster@programming.dev 12 points 2 days ago

The Phoronix comments are notoriously toxic - I went to the article mostly to witness the incoherent rage in the comments and wasn't too disappointed.

[–] ogeist@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

I do think it's important that there is a switch to a newer language like Rust away from C eventually.

The problem is you can't come in swinging to be let into the party, there are processes and tests to be done.

[–] magic_lobster_party@fedia.io 37 points 3 days ago

There have been talks and efforts about bringing Rust to Linux for more than a decade. This is not something that has been swift.