this post was submitted on 03 Feb 2025
396 points (96.5% liked)

politics

19844 readers
4610 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] RedditRefugee69@lemmynsfw.com -2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Have you done anything like that yet?

[–] RamblingPanda@lemmynsfw.com 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Not my country, not my lifestyle. But when all those gun nuts give a militia protecting the democracy for an answer to the question why the second amendment is necessary you have to wonder if they started maching by now. Because if not, that argument might be bull.

[–] RedditRefugee69@lemmynsfw.com -1 points 2 days ago (2 children)

It's easier to call for someone else to be brave than it is to be brave.

[–] zovits@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I'm not a vegan, nor claim or aim to be one. But if I went about loudly proclaiming that I was, using this to justify my actions, and then it became public knowledge that I am in fact not a vegan, then it would be the same hypocrisy. When a group claims to need weapons to quell a threat to democracy, and then proceeds to ignore the threat when it arises, then they are hypocrites. Hope that helped understand the point - let me know if it did 👍

[–] RedditRefugee69@lemmynsfw.com 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I get you, but being a vegan requires zero risk of injury or incarceration.

Like I told the (much less pleasant) other user, it's no surprise that people are less brave than they'd like you to believe. That's just... human nature.

[–] zovits@lemmy.world 1 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Sure, it was them who acted tough for the rewards when there were no risks and now are reluctant to actually take those risks. And this is textbook hypocrisy that deserves to be called out.

[–] RedditRefugee69@lemmynsfw.com 1 points 5 hours ago

You're missing my point and I'm not sure if it's because you refuse to accept it or you aren't understanding what I'm writing, so I'll throw a commonly accepted axiom out:

Easier said than done.

[–] RamblingPanda@lemmynsfw.com 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I'm not calling anyone to be brave. I'm calling them to put their money where their mouth is. Twice now, but you seem to not understand.

[–] RedditRefugee69@lemmynsfw.com 0 points 2 days ago (1 children)

You are using synonyms in this context. That's twice you've pretended they're different. I don't know why you don't understand.

[–] RamblingPanda@lemmynsfw.com 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

You no understand, me see this. Me not bother anymore. You sleep tight.

[–] RedditRefugee69@lemmynsfw.com 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Interesting to see whatever point you were trying to make could not withstand the overwhelming urge to be an asshole.

[–] RamblingPanda@lemmynsfw.com 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Aw you, I think the same about you 💕🤗

I mean, you very clearly started the hostilities.