this post was submitted on 30 Jan 2025
16 points (100.0% liked)

askchapo

23063 readers
241 users here now

Ask Hexbear is the place to ask and answer ~~thought-provoking~~ questions.

Rules:

  1. Posts must ask a question.

  2. If the question asked is serious, answer seriously.

  3. Questions where you want to learn more about socialism are allowed, but questions in bad faith are not.

  4. Try !feedback@hexbear.net if you're having questions about regarding moderation, site policy, the site itself, development, volunteering or the mod team.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
PorkrollPosadist@hexbear.net
replaceable@hexbear.net
VILenin@hexbear.net
EmmaGoldman@hexbear.net
SexUnderSocialism@hexbear.net
ZoomeristLeninist@hexbear.net
khizuo@hexbear.net
Sulvy@hexbear.net
16
Is the "training flight" story false? (hexbear.net)
submitted 5 months ago by culpritus@hexbear.net to c/askchapo@hexbear.net
3 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth revealed the three soldiers who were aboard the chopper were a "fairly experienced crew" doing a "required annual night evaluation."

The call sign was reported as PAT25 which is a specific call sign for the transportation of VIPs in DC area.

PAT US Army Priority Air Transport (Andrews AFB)

Why would a training flight use that call sign? Wouldn't a different call sign be used if it was just a training evaluation flight?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Infamousblt@hexbear.net 18 points 5 months ago

There is basically a zero percent chance any of us will ever actually know the answer to this. If it was a training flight they'll say it was and okay. If it was not a training flight they'll still say it was a training flight and even if somehow the real situation is leaked that leak won't really be trustworthy anyway.