this post was submitted on 26 Jan 2025
684 points (94.0% liked)

politics

19603 readers
4059 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

"If the purges [of potential voters], challenges and ballot rejections were random, it wouldn’t matter. It’s anything but random. For example, an audit by the State of Washington found that a Black voter was 400% more likely than a white voter to have their mail-in ballot rejected. Rejection of Black in-person votes, according to a US Civil Rights Commission study in Florida, ran 14.3% or one in seven ballots cast."

"[...] Democracy can win* despite the 2.3% suppression headwind.

And that’s our job as Americans: to end the purges, the vigilante challenges, the ballot rejections and the attitude that this is all somehow OK."

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 7 points 3 days ago (1 children)

The problem is that a lot of people, also on here equate people saying that “this is going to alienate voters” with saying “this is going to alienate me”, and then go into personal attacks of “are Republicans better then?” or “you’re the problem because you don’t vote”.

Centrists only did that because in all cases, they supported the behavior that was alienating voters and didn't want it to change. Even if that meant trump again.

[–] HK65@sopuli.xyz 0 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I wouldn't even say that, it's just there really were a lot of trolls going "whatabout?", especially here, as some people want the US to fall, and honestly Trump is the best candidate for that. Mix in a bunch of other trolls screaming "bluemaga" for the heck of it, and you couldn't have a decent conversation anymore.

I'm just saying we shouldn't fall into the trap of going into a circlejerk again, it's past the election, it would be great to have the conversations that are needed but we couldn't have before the election. There are some great people in the Dem party as well, again, Lina Khan's work was inspiring, and despite recent events, it did make a huge difference. We need more people like her.

And on the other hand, Luigi has shown that there is a broad societal base wanting this constant madness to end. People just want to live, all people, even Republicans.

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

it’s past the election, it would be great to have the conversations that are needed but we couldn’t have before the election.

The "we can't have this conversation right now" thing was a fucking excuse to continue enabling the genocide. Centrists will never admit they were horribly, monstrously wrong to support genocide.

It's all they ever were, and all they will ever be.

[–] HK65@sopuli.xyz 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

That is it though, where are all those "we can't have this conversation right now" people now? This is the time to have the conversation. Hello?

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

That is it though, where are all those “we can’t have this conversation right now” people now?

In case you missed it, they're blaming everyone that they told to shut up because “we can’t have this conversation right now”. Now it's too fucking late, and that was absolutely the entire idea. If Harris had won, the line would be "give her some time" until it was "too close to midterms to have this conversation."

There's never time to have any conversation. Centrists just move to the right. They do not listen to anyone to their left, ever, for any reason.

This is the time to have the conversation. Hello?

Cool. Let's start with the facts: Netanyahu is committing genocide. He was committing genocide during the Biden administration. Biden supported him and was wrong to do so. Do you accept this as true?

[–] HK65@sopuli.xyz 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Netanyahu is committing genocide. He was committing genocide during the Biden administration. Biden supported him and was wrong to do so. Do you accept this as true?

Fuck yes, along with suppressing dissent and legitimate protest about it in likely unlawful ways, and also applying unjust pressure on the ICC to exempt Western aligned war criminals, thus degrading the rule of law all over the globe.

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 0 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Good. You're not a genocide denier. We can have a conversation.

Do you suppose that the Democratic Party is worth saving anymore? Because I'm very much doubting so after the Biden administration.

[–] HK65@sopuli.xyz 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

That is a very hard question.

Just based on my experience, as I'm originally from a country that was going through, is still going through its Trump phase, it doesn't matter. They will only get out of the way if they are forced to, and time and again they proved they are against third party candidates more than Republicans, and vice versa in fact, the Reps will hit you harder than the Dems if they see you usurping them. This is just as it was in my home as well. No enterprise to "force the Dems to quit" will work because the entire system will work against you.

The only way to break this that I've seen work is that people should join small local mutual aid groups, which are political in nature, but not partisan in the sense of being beholden to the big two. Like the DSA in the US I guess? And wait for the opportunity while helping others and sabotaging the worst excesses of the government.

Or do a revolution I guess, because contrary to what everyone says everywhere, some of them do in fact succeed in creating a better society. Even when they fail. Revolutions got rid of the divine right of kings, not "moderation and slow progress", and revolution got rid of dictators like Ceaucescu as well.

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

The only way to break this that I’ve seen work is that people should join small local mutual aid groups

How do we get from "small mutual aid groups" to "fix the genocidal two party system?" If the answer is incrementalism, it is no answer. Incrementalism got us here.

[–] HK65@sopuli.xyz 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Radical change on the local level. Instead of trying to turn whole states by increment, turn towns and districts radically. Subvert federal decisions locally, and if you provide a schema for others to follow.

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I'm still not seeing how working for my local food bank (the nearest pin on the map when I look up mutual aid. Next closest one is like 4 hours away) is going to get anywhere towards changing the bipartisan pro-genocide hegemony.

[–] HK65@sopuli.xyz 2 points 2 days ago

You can help people, shield then from government overreach and change their minds by talking to them instead of just shouting into a megacorp-censored online void.

That's how the consies get people as well, churches being one of the last places you can socialise and discuss civics.

It will of course take a lot of people doing this, but that's how organising people works. The alternative is doing a Luigi, but that has dire personal consequences.