this post was submitted on 24 Jan 2025
39 points (100.0% liked)

Climate Crisis, Biosphere & Societal Collapse

1163 readers
61 users here now

A place to share news, experiences and discussion about the continuing climate crisis, societal collapse, and biosphere collapse. Please be respectful of each other and remember the human.

Long live the Lützerath Mud Wizard.

Useful Links:

DISCORD - Collapse

Earth - A Global Map of Wind, Weather and Ocean Conditions - Use the menu at bottom left to toggle different views. For example, you can see where wildfires/smoke are by selecting "Chem - COsc" to see carbon monoxide (CO) surface concentration.

Climate Reanalyzer (University of Maine) - A source for daily updated average global air temps, sea surface temps, sea ice, weather and more.

National Weather Service Climate Prediction Center (US) - Information about ENSO and weather predictions.

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Association (NOAA) Global Temperature Rankings Outlook (US) - Tool that is updated each month, concurrent with the release of the monthly global climate report.

Canadian Wildland Fire Information System - Government of Canada

Surging Seas Risk Zone Map - For discovering which areas could be underwater soon.

Check out our sister sub for collapse-related memes and silly stuff, Faster Than Expected!
AKA
c/fte@supoli.xyz

Alternative community on Reddthat

If there are any links you think are important that should be added to the list, please send a message and let me know.

Thanks for coming to c/collapse!

This is a supoli.xyz community.
SUPOLI GENERAL RULES:

  1. Remember the human! (no harassment, threats, etc.)
  2. No racism or other discrimination
  3. No Nazis, QAnon or similar whackos and no endorsement of them
  4. No porn
  5. No ads or spam
  6. No content against Finnish law

Supoli FAQ

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Like many, I did buy into the idea that big catastrophes would do something to politics,” said Luisa Neubauer from Fridays for Future Germany. “I bought into that – and I’m glad about it – because I was naively believing there was a democratic responsibility that would live through coalition changes and climate changes.”

The 28-year-old activist, who spent three months in the US before the presidential election, said she had been shocked to see the destruction from Hurricane Helene “play into the cards of those denying climate disasters”.

Far-right influencers and conspiracy theorists used the wildfires that ravaged California this month to attack efforts to stop the planet from heating. Similar disinformation was seen in Spain after deadly floods struck Valencia in October.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] in4apenny@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

A stable paycheck to believe otherwise is the most convincing. "I would do something, but I can't risk losing my job" is the most common excuse for allowing tyranny.

[–] rah@feddit.uk 2 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

allowing tyranny

Tyranny isn't "allowed" by those who suffer under it. That's a really terrible thing to say.

[–] in4apenny@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago) (1 children)

Those who choose the paycheck to comply with it vs suffering under it are the ones who allow it. "I only worked with the fascists so I would survive" is what a fascist is.

[–] rah@feddit.uk 1 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Those who choose the paycheck to comply with it vs suffering under it are the ones who allow it.

I don't understand this sentence.

"I only worked with the fascists so I would survive" is what a fascist is.

That's not what a fascist is.

[–] in4apenny@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

"I was just following orders." Those who's comforts are maintained by tyranny, and don't want to lose the comfort provided by tyranny to stand up against it, are directly enabling tyranny. Tyrants wouldn't last if not for the complacent "enlightened" centrist who thinks the balanced and sensible perspective is to "Keep Calm and Carry On." "At least they're not going after me!" says those who's loyalty has been bought by tyrants out of fear. The same kind of people who think the ones who fight tyrants are "terrorists."

[–] rah@feddit.uk 0 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

I'm glad you haven't used the word "allow".

loyalty has been bought by tyrants out of fear

Paralysis due to fear does not imply loyalty.

[–] in4apenny@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

"First they came for the Communists And I did not speak out Because I was not a Communist Then they came for the Socialists And I did not speak out Because I was not a Socialist Then they came for the trade unionists And I did not speak out Because I was not a trade unionist Then they came for the Jews And I did not speak out Because I was not a Jew Then they came for me And there was no one left To speak out for me"

  • Pastor Martin Niemöller - Initially an antisemitic Nazi supporter, his views changed when he was imprisoned in a concentration camp for speaking out against Nazi control of churches.
[–] rah@feddit.uk 1 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

LOL that doesn't contract anything I said.

[–] in4apenny@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

The guy who wrote that poem was the aforementioned complacent majority who was comfortable with fascism till it was his turn. It will be your turn soon.

[–] rah@feddit.uk 2 points 7 hours ago

I'm glad we agree that your comment didn't contradict what I said.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 1 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

Tyranny is absolutely allowed by the "moderates" who don't consider themselves aligned with the tyrants but also don't actively work to resist them. Go read "Letter From a Birmingham Jail" if you need an explanation.

[–] rah@feddit.uk 0 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

the "moderates"

I don't know what you're referring to with this new term you've introduced.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 0 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (1 children)

the "moderates"

I don't know what you're referring to with this new term you've introduced.

What part of

Go read "Letter From a Birmingham Jail" if you need an explanation.

did you not understand?

Here's the link; go read it: https://www.africa.upenn.edu/Articles_Gen/Letter_Birmingham.html

...and if you won't do that, fine, I'll spoon-feed you the relevant quote:

We should never forget that everything Adolf Hitler did in Germany was "legal" and everything the Hungarian freedom fighters did in Hungary was "illegal." It was "illegal" to aid and comfort a Jew in Hitler's Germany. Even so, I am sure that, had I lived in Germany at the time, I would have aided and comforted my Jewish brothers. If today I lived in a Communist country where certain principles dear to the Christian faith are suppressed, I would openly advocate disobeying that country's antireligious laws.

I must make two honest confessions to you, my Christian and Jewish brothers. First, I must confess that over the past few years I have been gravely disappointed with the white moderate. I have almost reached the regrettable conclusion that the Negro's great stumbling block in his stride toward freedom is not the White Citizen's Counciler or the Ku Klux Klanner, but the white moderate, who is more devoted to "order" than to justice; who prefers a negative peace which is the absence of tension to a positive peace which is the presence of justice; who constantly says: "I agree with you in the goal you seek, but I cannot agree with your methods of direct action"; who paternalistically believes he can set the timetable for another man's freedom; who lives by a mythical concept of time and who constantly advises the Negro to wait for a "more convenient season." Shallow understanding from people of good will is more frustrating than absolute misunderstanding from people of ill will. Lukewarm acceptance is much more bewildering than outright rejection.

[–] rah@feddit.uk 2 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

I don't understand why you're telling me this. I said that tyranny isn't "allowed" by those who suffer under it. Nothing you've said contradicts what I said.

[–] grue@lemmy.world -1 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Do you really think the Venn diagram of "those who suffer under it" and "moderates who comply with the regime" has zero overlap?

[–] rah@feddit.uk 2 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

"those who suffer under it" and "moderates who comply with the regime"

I haven't commented on "moderates".