15
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 22 Aug 2023
15 points (100.0% liked)
Australia
3507 readers
83 users here now
A place to discuss Australia and important Australian issues.
Before you post:
If you're posting anything related to:
- The Environment, post it to Aussie Environment
- Politics, post it to Australian Politics
- World News/Events, post it to World News
- A question to Australians (from outside) post it to Ask an Australian
If you're posting Australian News (not opinion or discussion pieces) post it to Australian News
Rules
This community is run under the rules of aussie.zone. In addition to those rules:
- When posting news articles use the source headline and place your commentary in a separate comment
Banner Photo
Congratulations to @Tau@aussie.zone who had the most upvoted submission to our banner photo competition
Recommended and Related Communities
Be sure to check out and subscribe to our related communities on aussie.zone:
- Australian News
- World News (from an Australian Perspective)
- Australian Politics
- Aussie Environment
- Ask an Australian
- AusFinance
- Pictures
- AusLegal
- Aussie Frugal Living
- Cars (Australia)
- Coffee
- Chat
- Aussie Zone Meta
- bapcsalesaustralia
- Food Australia
- Aussie Memes
Plus other communities for sport and major cities.
https://aussie.zone/communities
Moderation
Since Kbin doesn't show Lemmy Moderators, I'll list them here. Also note that Kbin does not distinguish moderator comments.
Additionally, we have our instance admins: @lodion@aussie.zone and @Nath@aussie.zone
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
it is 10 kmh it won't make a difference. I'm sure we'd see no more accidents than we do now if we made all 60 roads 80 instead.
The article cites a 20% reduction in braking distance, but still not going to solve the problem. Fencing and specialised crossings are better solutions since they don't rely on drivers paying attention
The LNP claims to have spoken to experts who said that fences are not a good option here.
Labor claims to have also spoken to experts who disagree with that.
It's really not clear to me who is right in this instance. The LNP idea does have some merit in terms of how fencing would restrict wildlife movement for food/social reasons, as well as trapping them if there's a bushfire.
But yeah, the speed limit reduction, as long as it's actually enforced, is a good one. Stopping distance increases with the square of velocity, and at least with human pedestrians the deadliness of a crash increases approximately exponentially with velocity. So a small decrease in speed can actually have an enormous benefit to safety. At 70 km/h a pedestrian has a roughly 99% chance of dying. At 60 km/h it's down to like 88%. Of course, down at 40 km/h it's more like 25% and 30 km/h is 18%—which is why pedestrian and cycling safety advocates say local streets should be no more than 30 km/h. I don't know quite how applicable that is to wildlife strikes, but the basic concept behind it should still apply.