this post was submitted on 05 Jan 2025
75 points (80.0% liked)

science

15354 readers
969 users here now

A community to post scientific articles, news, and civil discussion.

rule #1: be kind

<--- rules currently under construction, see current pinned post.

2024-11-11

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

His answer is the octopus. What say you?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] FundMECFS@slrpnk.net 71 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

But they

  1. Have extremely short lifespan so a limited capacity to learn (1-2 years)
  2. Don’t raise their offspring, in fact after mating/laying eggs they naturally die, so no knowledge sharing
  3. Are extremely solitary and don’t have social bonds or do anything socially, so little communication/passing of knowledge
[–] Hamartiogonic@sopuli.xyz 25 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

On top of that, they might not even survive the CO2 and consequent ocean acidification. If humans were to get eradicated by some super plague, then octopi might still stand a chance, but the points you mentioned are going to make that journey much harder.

[–] FundMECFS@slrpnk.net 21 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

I worked as an intern at a lab studying octopus vulgaris.

They are extremely sensitive to all sorts of things in the water. Keeping them well is very difficult. Although I would imagine if there are big but gradual changes in water environment, they would have a chance of adapting faster due to short life cycles and the fact that mating creates hundreds of thousands of eggs.

[–] Hamartiogonic@sopuli.xyz 6 points 2 weeks ago

If we assume that they somehow survive all the way to the very moment when humans get a permanent ban to the Earth Server, then the changes should be gradual enough after that. The bad news is, humans love to play this game by recklessly exploiting every bug and glitch, so rapid changes (in evolutionary scale) are the norm.

See also: Peppered moth evolution

[–] Anticorp@lemmy.world 8 points 2 weeks ago

Octopi would rule the world if they had any sort of generational data transfer.

[–] scarabic@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

I’m not even convinced that intelligence is a requirement to be the dominant species. Intelligence is so expensive that nature rarely ever selects for it.

Trilobytes did pretty damn well for a hell of a lot longer than we have so far. I think we need a stronger working definition of “dominant” in order to judge any candidates.

[–] FundMECFS@slrpnk.net 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

But the reason he gives for them becoming the dominant species is their intelligence.

[–] scarabic@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

Sure well if that is a precondition of the conversation, we can talk about it. But IMO it may be a faulty assumption to go on.