92
Mozilla's petition against in-browser censorship law
(foundation.mozilla.org)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 18 Aug 2023
92 points (100.0% liked)
Technology
30 readers
1 users here now
This magazine is dedicated to discussions on the latest developments, trends, and innovations in the world of technology. Whether you are a tech enthusiast, a developer, or simply curious about the latest gadgets and software, this is the place for you. Here you can share your knowledge, ask questions, and engage in discussions on topics such as artificial intelligence, robotics, cloud computing, cybersecurity, and more. From the impact of technology on society to the ethical considerations of new technologies, this category covers a wide range of topics related to technology. Join the conversation and let's explore the ever-evolving world of technology together!
founded 1 year ago
You're right that under the hood, there's only Firefox, Safari and Chromium, but you're overestimating the influence of Chromium here.
For one, Chromium is controlled by Google. It's *technically* open-source, but Google decides what's included into it.
And secondly, Chromium already has an API for blocking webpages. All these browsers could just pre-install an extension (and hide it from users), to comply with that law.
But even if it didn't have that API, it only takes a relatively non-invasive patch to add such blocking.
Chromium is usually said to exert a strong influence, because you can't just patch things when it comes to web standards. You need to ship what's being shipped in Chrome to enjoy compatibility with all the same webpages. And usually, what's in Chromium is what's being shipped in Chrome.