20
submitted 1 year ago by NightOwl@lemm.ee to c/worldnews@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Quacksalber@sh.itjust.works 29 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

And what is wrong with Ukraine not just bashing its head into russian defenses and instead go for a slow-and-steady approach? They still have reserves to spare, word is Ukraine is rotating its troops on the front regularly. So as long as Ukraine can keep up the pressure and russia not being able to stop their slow advance, they will be successful eventually. Would another Kharkiv thrunder-run be preferable? Surely.
But russia is prepared this time. And instead of being all doom-and-gloom, the West could step up its commitment to see Ukraine win. Apart from artillery shell production, weapon manufacturers still see no increase in weapons procurement. It's time for the West to let actions follow its words on support of Ukraine. As long as their words ring hollow, Putin only has to wait and eventually outpace dwindling western support.

[-] Trudge@lemmygrad.ml 6 points 1 year ago

The problem of that approach is that winter is coming soon and battles will soon ground to a halt. Which will give Russians the time to build up their defensive layers again.

Spring offensive of 2024 will commence afterwards. And then the spring offensive of 2025, 2026, 2027...

[-] gary_host_laptop@lemmy.ml -2 points 1 year ago

Plus tanks work better in the winter and Russia has quite a few of them which are cheap and easy to deploy.

[-] FaceDeer@kbin.social -1 points 1 year ago

Had quite a few of them.

this post was submitted on 20 Aug 2023
20 points (55.6% liked)

World News

32318 readers
719 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS