News
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.
Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.
7. No duplicate posts.
If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.
All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
view the rest of the comments
The US Congress impeached Trump in 2019, and again in 2021. Where we failed is conviction.
Hopefully South Korea has better success with step two.
The Impeachment process isn't identical between the two. US congress has a lower bar for impeachment but requires a 2/3rd vote in the senate to convict which is where those both failed.
In South Korea they have a 2/3rd threshold to impeach and then it goes to a constitutional court to uphold or not uphold it. The prime minister becomes acting president right after impeachment while the constitutional court reviews it
There's recent precident of the constitutional court upholding an impeachment unanimously in south korea in 2017
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Impeachment_of_Park_Geun-hye
Gotcha. So they’re already past the more challenging phase of the process. Great!
Although the constitutional court does have 3 vacancies right now and it does look more conservative at the moment so it's not fully a given that it will get through
Thanks for the insight. I’m not familiar with their governmental structure, let alone the current climate.
Between the ongoing protests and now celebration in the streets over the impeachment vote, do you think the constitutional court will consider the repercussions of their decision on civil unrest?
Given my limited knowledge and all of the highly unpredictable things going on in democracies around the world, I'm just gonna opt out of making any firm predictions myself. We'll find out in at most 180 days (they have that amount of time to decide)
I'll note that others predict the court will ask the national assembly to try to fill those 3 vacancies. If they do so, it would make it easier to pass since it requires 6 to vote in favor for it to succeed regardless of vacancies. There are currently only 6 on the court
I'll also note that in 2004, the constitutional court rejected Roh Moo-hyun's impeachment when there was strong backlash to the impeachment in the public. The charges there were much more minor than what happened here
Very interesting. I’ll keep an eye out for updates. Thanks again for your insight!
An impeachment without a conviction is useless. Fucker is going to be president again despite 2 toothless "impeachments". Might as well have called it a "mildly stern talking-to without any actual consequences"
The only reason to even mention it is to shine light on the glaring injustice.
I totally agree the result was injustice. Just saying that there isn’t a difference yet.
Sorry, didn't mean to come off on the offensive if i did -- I'm just beyond-frustrated with this shit anymore 😅
Nah. You’re fine. We’re all pretty fed up with this.
They knew it would fail both times. They wanted it on record that some of the government tried to do something about this guy. So when things happen over the next four years that maybe even turns some Republicans against him, it won't be like oh my god you can't just impeach the President. It will be Donald Trump impeached for third time, but with a different result.
I realize what I've written is practically copium, but it is one of the real reasons they impeached twice while knowing they would fail to convict.