this post was submitted on 10 Dec 2024
1177 points (99.7% liked)

News

35724 readers
2408 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

A Gallup poll shows 62% of Americans believe the government should ensure universal healthcare coverage—the highest support in over a decade.

While Democratic backing remains strong at 90%, support among Republicans and Independents has also grown since 2020.

Public frustration with the for-profit healthcare system has intensified following the arrest of a suspect in the murder of UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson, reportedly motivated by anger at the industry.

Recent controversies, including Anthem’s rollback of anesthesia coverage cuts, and debates over Medicare privatization highlight ongoing dissatisfaction with the system.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] otp@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

"but I couldn't vote for the Democrats in good faith!!!"

Well now you've helped elect Trump. Hope that aligns with your morals!

(General "you", not you specifically)

[–] UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Aren't you concerned at all with the large number of people that are under represented by their choices in the voting booth?

State level electoral reform will give more political parties the chance to be involved in future elections with no chance of a spoiler effect.

People would be free to vote for their preferred candidate, safe in the knowledge that their vote would still be counted against the republicans.

Who could say no to more democracy? Who could possibly be against ensuring their fellow country men/women/and more are fully represented to the best of our ability? Republicans? Yes, of course they are against democracy. How about the democratic party? Do they support democracy?

More political parties means more chances to beat the Republicans. More political parties means more people are involved in politics. More people being involved in politics statistically means more votes for the democratic party.

Why is the DNC saying no to these easy extra votes? Why wouldn't democrats use every tool at their disposal to defeat the republicans?

Perhaps they view their poltical party to be more important then the nation state itself. Party over country, at all costs.

[–] otp@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago

Aren't you concerned at all with the large number of people that are under represented by their choices in the voting booth?

Yes, but they should still vote. Anyone who didn't vote decided that they're okay with Trump. Generally, anyone not okay with Trump who didn't vote is either stupid, ignorant, or lying about not being okay with Trump being elected.

State level electoral reform will give more political parties the chance to be involved in future elections with no chance of a spoiler effect.

Yeah, I agree. But you don't have that. So we work with the system we have.

Who could say no to more democracy? Who could possibly be against ensuring their fellow country men/women/and more are fully represented to the best of our ability? Republicans? Yes, of course they are against democracy. How about the democratic party? Do they support democracy?

If you think that Trump is worse than the Democrat candidate, then you vote Democrat. Deciding not to vote doesn't give you more democracy, it gives you less.

More political parties means more chances to beat the Republicans. More political parties means more people are involved in politics. More people being involved in politics statistically means more votes for the democratic party.

Not with FPTP. I'm in Canada, where we realistically have a 3-party system. What happens in some parts of the country (including Federally) is the Left vote gets split and the Right vote often ends up winning.

Why is the DNC saying no to these easy extra votes? Why wouldn't democrats use every tool at their disposal to defeat the republicans?

If it were that simple and easy, they'd do it. But it's not. If the Right doesn't split too, and if FPTP isn't replaced with something better, then the Left has just screwed itself out of ever being elected again.