92
submitted 1 year ago by genesis@kbin.social to c/tech@kbin.social

The French government is considering a law that would require web browsers – like Mozilla's Firefox – to block websites chosen by the government.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Here's an article about it from the ACLU:

The Patriot Act increases the governments surveillance powers in four areas:

  1. Records searches. It expands the government’s ability to look at records on an individual’s activity being held by a third parties. (Section 215)
  2. Secret searches. It expands the government’s ability to search private property without notice to the owner. (Section 213)
  3. Intelligence searches. It expands a narrow exception to the Fourth Amendment that had been created for the collection of foreign intelligence information (Section 218).
  4. “Trap and trace” searches. It expands another Fourth Amendment exception for spying that collects “addressing” information about the origin and destination of communications, as opposed to the content (Section 214).

From reading the text of the law myself

  1. This must go through a judge; the requirements are lessened, but it does need to be justified (i.e. they can't just storm your house); the difference with a regular warrant is that they don't need to serve the warrant first, they can go ahead and force entry if needed
  2. Again, this requires a warrant, see #1
  3. This is just a broadening if the language (legally changes text from "the purpose" to "a significant purpose"); still problematic, but the requirement to get a warrant stays in force
  4. Yes, this broadens the type of data they can collect, but again, they still need a warrant, but this allows them to collect more than just the data they need for the immediate investigation

It's absolutely problematic, and I disagreed with it from the day I heard it introduced, but it doesn't constutute elimination of the right to privacy that exists with the first amendment. It also only applies to federal authorities, so your local and state authorities (i.e. the ones average citizens are more likely to interact with) are still bound.

I absolutely hate the Patriot Act and everything related to it (esp. all the NSA nonsense) and think we should repeal anything related to the law and instead pass more strict limitations on governments.

[-] Gordon_Freeman@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

This must go through a judge; the requirements are lessened, but it does need to be justified

"We think this random citizen is a spy or a terrorist". Justified. Authorities now how to abuse their powers and they do it

this post was submitted on 18 Aug 2023
92 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

30 readers
1 users here now

This magazine is dedicated to discussions on the latest developments, trends, and innovations in the world of technology. Whether you are a tech enthusiast, a developer, or simply curious about the latest gadgets and software, this is the place for you. Here you can share your knowledge, ask questions, and engage in discussions on topics such as artificial intelligence, robotics, cloud computing, cybersecurity, and more. From the impact of technology on society to the ethical considerations of new technologies, this category covers a wide range of topics related to technology. Join the conversation and let's explore the ever-evolving world of technology together!

founded 1 year ago