this post was submitted on 29 Nov 2024
404 points (97.4% liked)
Microblog Memes
9356 readers
2318 users here now
A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.
Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.
Rules:
- Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
- Be nice.
- No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
- Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.
Related communities:
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Both sexes can have or lack tits. So the first one is okay, the second one is sexist.
Who said anything about sex? I’d rather read an essay comparing these:
Just keep these fellas out of it:
They’ll eat all the nuts for sure!
In the same way people of all genders can have tits, so can people of all genders have nuts, so if that's your reasoning, either both are sexist, or neither are.
If you read my comment carefully you will notice that I was talking about Sex, not Gender.
ovaries are just nuts in the inside
I Snickers at this comment.
Colloquial "sexism" is heavily based on gender, so if you want to be precise you should probably use another phrase entirely
And if you knew anything about either, you'd know that both are a spectrum, so your argument is still invalid
https://scatter.wordpress.com/2022/01/30/sex-as-a-social-construct/
https://www.nature.com/articles/518288a
yo this debate is the tits 🔥🔥
Yes.