995
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by merde@sh.itjust.works to c/privacy@lemmy.ml

๐Ÿ˜

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

With only one country doing this, they can soak the cost, but the ARPU (average revenue per user) of Facebook, or any social media site, is actually quite low. It literally costs them money to operate in the country now.

The question becomes "How many other countries can do the same before we are forced to care?"

Fun Fact: Reddit had the lowest ARPU of any major social media.

[-] porous_grey_matter@lemmy.ml 1 points 10 months ago

The average revenue varies wildly with how rich the user is, though. It's much more profitable to market to Norwegians than Indians given they have vastly higher spending power.

this post was submitted on 17 Aug 2023
995 points (98.9% liked)

Privacy

31609 readers
77 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

Chat rooms

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS