this post was submitted on 18 Aug 2023
2000 points (99.2% liked)

Technology

73424 readers
4356 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
2000
sdfsdfsdf (foundation.mozilla.org)
submitted 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) by AccidentalLemming@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world
 

dsfsdfsdfsd

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Asymptote@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 years ago (3 children)

If nobody likes him, them why do people vote for him?

[–] Darkpepito_tux@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago

Only ~65% of French people have voted on the first round, and only 27.84% voted for him on the first round. So it's not representaive of " people". And if your asking why so many people didn't vote, it's beacause the working class and the younger people are desperate and think that in any case the future president, whoever he is, will do nothing for them (which is kinda true).

[–] seliaste@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

The second round opposed him to a facist. We voted against the facist. The first round was won because of different factors including extreme PR from macron (with often false promises) and vote fragmentation of the left wing

[–] Asymptote@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

So you have a political elites that is completely divorced from the people they govern?

I feel like France has solved this before.

[–] seliaste@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Pretty much. Problem is, the solution you're thinking of is no longer applicable when you can risk serious injuries, lifelong handicaps and even death for simple protests due to the current police brutality happening right now. The people is not as desperate as in 1789 when there was a huge famine, we still have things to lose.

[–] Asymptote@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Those risks were present in the 1700s too. Moreso even.

[–] seliaste@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Yes and what I'm saying is that people have too much to lose risking this unlike back then

[–] Asymptote@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Fair enough. I'm also not* rioting.

[–] angstylittlecatboy@reddthat.com 1 points 2 years ago

I don't know about French politics in particular, but in all democracies pretty much, sometimes there's just not a better option.