25
submitted 6 days ago by Mex@feddit.uk to c/active_travel@feddit.uk
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] givesomefucks@lemmy.world -5 points 6 days ago

14.6 mph is pretty fast when you don't obey stop signs, stop lights, or any other traffic law, and refuse to wear any high vis safety equipment....

Also, the original headline says theyale it unsafe for pedestrians.

But then, the biking website you link just flat out fucking lied about that, even tho they have a screenshot that shows that they lied about it...

[-] Kirca@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago

The irony of complaining about only looking at screenshots when you clearly did not read the article.

Quoted from the article itself: "[...] if a substantial minority of cyclists and scooterists are determined to endanger the lives of pedestrians, and in some cases motorists [...]"

The biking website didn't lie, they referenced what the original author wrote.

[-] Iceblade02@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago

The article did cherry-pick, twist and misconstrue what was in the article, ignored the cited study that was the actual basis and instead chose to focus on... the photo?

Journalists nowadays tend to use barely-related stock photos for most articles anyway and besides, average speed does not equate to following speed limit, particularly in an urban environment which dictates frequent stops and slowdowns - as cyclists complaining about dangerous drivers should be well aware of.

[-] ALiteralCabbage@feddit.uk 2 points 3 days ago

Road.cc is chronic for that kind of thing. They have a "near miss of the week" section on their site - they thrive on being exactly the sort of irritating cyclists people get annoyed at.

Their primary product is rage bait and mediocre review content.

this post was submitted on 18 Nov 2024
25 points (96.3% liked)

UK Active Travel

56 readers
2 users here now

Any discussion of active travel.

founded 3 months ago
MODERATORS