765
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Snowclone@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

It's because they aren't. Clinton and Gore were 100% interventionist, and had no issues with preemptive war, some accused Clinton of starting a war to boost his popularity. Kerry was anti war historically, but pragmatic on Iraq, Hillary again with Bill not at all anti war-->

[-] Snowclone@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago

Obama's military adittude was ''a Democrat can't say no to the military'' and allowed whatever the joint chiefs wanted, which is never going to be anti war. And Biden was the same. Harris clearly not anti war either. Trump says he is, and that's more anti war than any Dem in my lifetime. Can he effectively govern for war reduction? No. He's an idiot, and liar. But he's selling it.

[-] zarkanian@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 month ago

Being "pragmatic on Iraq" turned off a lot of the left. Ralph Nader's running mate, Peter Camejo, remarked at the time "Kerry isn't Bush Lite. He's Bush Smart! We do not need a smarter Bush!" Apparently the electorate agreed, because W. Bush went on to win a second term.

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Hillary again with Bill not at all anti war–>

Directly responsible for escalation in Libya, as Sec State, and the deaths of tens of thousands as a result.

this post was submitted on 12 Nov 2024
765 points (98.2% liked)

Microblog Memes

6017 readers
1605 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS