this post was submitted on 12 Nov 2024
765 points (98.2% liked)

Microblog Memes

9486 readers
2728 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Sp00kyB00k@lemmy.world 6 points 11 months ago (3 children)

Maybe, even if they hate him. Know he is bad. The one takeway is that they liked Kamala even less. It is combination of desperation and despise. If the Dems don't learn from this, they will repeat the same mistakes over and over. Pick someone likeable

[–] edg@lemmy.world 14 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

No matter who Democrats pick they will always be painted as unlikeable, losers, and evil by Republicans. If you think picking a "likeable" candidate is the trick then you too have fallen for the endless Republican framing trap.

[–] zarkanian@sh.itjust.works 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Rrrrrriiiiiigggghhhhhtttt. There's nothing wrong with Democrats, and if you think otherwise, then you've bought into Republican propaganda.

[–] edg@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago

I didn't say that, but ya you seem to have fallen for Republican propaganda.

[–] Mongostein@lemmy.ca 3 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Shoulda ran Walz as prez from the get-go. Dude ticks all the masculinity boxes the right loves while being a real human being.

[–] zarkanian@sh.itjust.works 3 points 11 months ago

That was my first thought when I heard Walz speak: "Wow! Can this guy be president instead?"

Now he has no hope of becoming president, because he's connected to a historically losing campaign. The Democrats would never nominate him now.

[–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 1 points 11 months ago (2 children)
[–] piecat@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

always has been

[–] inv3r510n@lemmy.world -1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

She didn’t lose because she’s a woman. She lost because she’s an empty suit neoliberal promising more of the same to a nation desperate for change as the majority of us are one paycheck away from disaster.

And before you have the knee jerk liberal response of bUt TrUmP iS wOrSe you’re missing the point. This election - and elections around the world this year - are referendums on the current establishment across parties and ideologies.

Either learn that neoliberalism is a losing ideology and embrace leftist positions or lose to fascists over and over again.