this post was submitted on 13 Nov 2024
570 points (95.7% liked)

Technology

59415 readers
2634 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

That’s all.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] iii@mander.xyz 58 points 4 days ago (4 children)

That's all.

There's more: microsoft outlook is garbage

[–] CaptDust@sh.itjust.works 38 points 4 days ago (5 children)

The new outlook has exceeded "garbage" and gone all the way to dumpster fire. It sometimes takes upwards of 15, 30 seconds to open an email. The new auto formatting is a hindrance to be overcome by tricking it to act how you want. Trying to schedule an event across timezones shits the bed half the time, resulting in improper meeting times being sent out. Absolute failure.

[–] Gork@lemm.ee 11 points 4 days ago

New Outlook also doesn't support Really Simple Syndication, which I used a lot with the Old Outlook.

So back to old Outlook I go.

[–] Passerby6497@lemmy.world 3 points 4 days ago

My CISO has all but said he's going to prevent any auto-rollout of that shit because it breaks decades of user training and TRUNCATES THE FRONT OF THE URL, NOT THE BACK LIKE ANY SENSIBLE APPLICATION.

Like, let's make it so Steve in accounting can't see that the login link he wants to click is actually haxxor.com instead of bank.com, makes perfect fucking sense.

[–] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 3 points 4 days ago

I accidentally switched to it and it dropped all my non-MS mailboxes. Then when I immediately switched back it had the gall to ask me why.

[–] Jeffool@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago

I will give respect where due: I like the sweep button. It's handy for me personally, as someone who is on several email lists that are public-facing. That's about it.

Every attempt to help me automatically is a pain. Like most things in this vein it never learns what you're trying to do, only what they would do in a given scenario that's vaguely like ours.

[–] capt_kafei@lemmy.ca 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Wait, really? I've found the new outlook opens emails faster than the old one, especially the HTML-heavy ones that my work loves to send me.

The refactor to the rules UI is really nice too, the old one was so crusty. Can't comment on the timezone issue though.

[–] CaptDust@sh.itjust.works 4 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I've been told the extended time to open is related to how big the outlook database is, I average 200 emails received a day with various alerts and notifications from internal tools and it cripples new outlook in about a week if I'm not diligent with keeping folders cleaned out/emails deleted. This volume wasn't a issue before I switched.

[–] Albbi@lemmy.ca 3 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Ah so your issue is, let me see here... Ah, actually using Outlook like a normal user.

I've tried switching to Thunderbird myself but it doesn't support Office 365 without a third party service. So I feel stuck with Outlook.

[–] CaptDust@sh.itjust.works 0 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Ah, actually using Outlook like a normal user.

Ha, right? I'm keeping my fingers crossed there is some executive at MS raging and it will get resolved before they force everyone off the legacy version. Surely there are people inside their organization with tons more traffic than I see.

[–] Thetimefarm@lemm.ee 4 points 4 days ago

There's probably a microsoft engineer out there somewhere sitting in a cubical who has the solution already written and tested and they just can't figure out how to send it to their boss. They've tried outlook, teams, github, skype, and even one drive but they're all so broken that it may just be faster to print the code out and mail it.

[–] stealth_cookies@lemmy.ca 4 points 4 days ago (2 children)

I'll die on the hill that classic outlook is far better than Gmail and similar web interfaces for email especially if you have long threads or lots of emails.

Also somehow Google's email search sucks so bad compared to searching in outlook.

[–] iii@mander.xyz 7 points 4 days ago (1 children)
[–] pressanykeynow@lemmy.world 4 points 4 days ago

It's actually disturbing that Thunderbird is the only good smtp/imap client available and it's not receiving that much funding.

[–] Scrollone@feddit.it 2 points 4 days ago

I agree. The old Outlook was snappy and dense of information. The new Outlook is just a fucking web page.

[–] Gingerlegs@lemmy.world 3 points 4 days ago

Ever try finding an old email by sender. Lol, good luck

[–] bulwark@lemmy.world 3 points 4 days ago (1 children)

If I'm being honest the only Microsoft product I actually like is Excel.

[–] CaptDust@sh.itjust.works 3 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

They're doing their best to "improve" excel too... I can't understand how their AI generated cell fill is worse than the old approach.