301
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 week ago

none of what you said addresses the facts that I raised. you are attacking things I didn't say and positions I don't hold.

[-] boomzilla@programming.dev 0 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Partially true and I know it but I don't give a F anymore now the world has a government that'll only speed up ecological demise. I feel veganism (or at least reducturianism) is a (albeit very small) chance to slow that down. Thanks for giving me the forum to spew my propaganda.

Partly true because you wrote the system is conserving resources where it really doesn't. Most of the energy is transformed into non-conserving but destructive forces: GHGs, manure run-off, pollution. A whole lot of energy is used to grow the miserable animal and only a fraction of it is coming out in form of quickly perishable food.

I addressed the 2/3 crop calorie argument already in my previous post. That's not what the original video was addressing. It was addressing the amount of crops (therefore land use, therefore number of rodents dying on harvest). Again your paper states we could ramp up the production of calories from plants just for humans and could feed some billion more people.

[-] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 week ago

I can't eat corncobs or stalks. feeding it to cattle so I can eat cheese and beef is a conservation of resources

this post was submitted on 09 Nov 2024
301 points (87.7% liked)

science

14597 readers
939 users here now

A community to post scientific articles, news, and civil discussion.

rule #1: be kind

<--- rules currently under construction, see current pinned post.

2024-11-11

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS