GenZedong

4594 readers

77 users here now

This is a Dengist community in favor of Bashar al-Assad with no information that can lead to the arrest of Hillary Clinton, our fellow liberal and queen. This community is not ironic. We are Marxists-Leninists.

This community is for posts about Marxism and geopolitics (including shitposts to some extent). Serious posts can be posted here or in /c/GenZhou. Reactionary or ultra-leftist cringe posts belong in /c/shitreactionariessay or /c/shitultrassay respectively.

We have a Matrix homeserver and a Matrix space. See this thread for more information. If you believe the server may be down, check the status on status.elara.ws.

Rules:

No bigotry, anti-communism, pro-imperialism or ultra-leftism (anti-AES)
We support indigenous liberation as the primary contradiction in settler colonies like the US, Canada, Australia, New Zealand and Israel
If you post an archived link (excluding archive.org), include the URL of the original article as well
Unless it's an obvious shitpost, include relevant sources
For articles behind paywalls, try to include the text in the post
Mark all posts containing NSFW images as NSFW (including things like Nazi imagery)

founded 4 years ago

MODERATORS

GrainEater@lemmygrad.ml

Elara@lemmygrad.ml

ComradePupIvy@lemmygrad.ml

American_Communist22@lemmygrad.ml

China announces rules to keep AI bound by ‘core socialist values’ (www.washingtonpost.com)

submitted 2 years ago by yogthos@lemmygrad.ml to c/genzedong@lemmygrad.ml

14 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] ksynwa@lemmygrad.ml 6 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Analysts criticized an earlier draft of the regulations released in April as deeply unfriendly to the industry. Some requirements, they said, like that companies should verify the accuracy of the data their AI models learned on — which in many cases includes huge chunks of text from the internet like Reddit and Wikipedia, both banned in China — would be nearly impossible to comply with.

I find it insane how ensuring the input's accuracy is something they balk at.

In chatting with Ernie, Chinese search giant Baidu’s prototype AI chatbot, The Washington Post found that even simple requests for facts about China’s government or top leader Xi prompted it to terminate the exchange with a canned reply.

deng stare

[–] besbin@lemmygrad.ml 6 points 2 years ago

the appeal aka hype of all the current AI is to they are able to ripped the fruit of free labor by scraping user generated data. Having to curate the data means they will have to spend resources on real employees which will cut into their profit so of course the capitalist gonna cry fault.

[–] darkcalling@lemmygrad.ml 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Analysts criticized an earlier draft of the regulations released in April as deeply unfriendly to the industry. Some requirements, they said, like that companies should verify the accuracy of the data their AI models learned on — which in many cases includes huge chunks of text from the internet like Reddit and Wikipedia, both banned in China — would be nearly impossible to comply with.

I find it insane how ensuring the input’s accuracy is something they balk at.

Exactly.

It's like uh they could just use verified sources to begin with instead of user edited stuff mainly staffed by the CIA and corporate influence peddlers? Like maybe China has a state encyclopedia, volumes of academic works that have been peer reviewed.

It's maddening that this is seen as a burden. Go back to conceptions of intelligent machines in like the 60s through 80s and many of the futurists there had them being carefully taught by ingesting written works separated into fiction and non-fiction, being taught by teachers, etc. These lazy western companies like chatgpt just want to skip all the hard work of actually making machines that have and can give correct answers, they want to skip to the finish line to collect the money and paper over and correct after the fact to the extent they can models built on falsity only as problems appear. China's approach to make sure the models are built correctly off of only good data to start with will likely be better to manage down the road.