853

Summary

Donald Trump’s re-election has fueled a surge in misogynistic, homophobic, and racist rhetoric among young men, reportedly emboldened by the president-elect’s history of inflammatory remarks about women.

In schools, boys have been caught using phrases like “your body, my choice” against female peers, prompting districts like Minnesota’s Hopkins Public Schools to issue warnings to parents about harassment.

The impact extends beyond schools, with activists on Texas State University’s campus displaying signs asserting that “women are property.”

This hostile climate has left many women feeling unsafe as a new far-right administration takes power.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world 266 points 1 week ago

Remember that 53% of white women voted for this.

They voted for them and all women to be considered property.

[-] Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works 87 points 1 week ago

College-educated white women backed Harris. All college-educated groups did. Maybe Democrats should work on making college more affordable, and accessible to women with small children. Frankly we should anyway. We should also start helping girls that get pregnant in high school finish with their diploma so college will be an option in their future. Especially since more of them are going to be forced to carry the pregnancy to term.

[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 83 points 1 week ago

Maybe Democrats should work on making college more affordable

Why do you think the wingers reacted so much to having loan forgiveness? Anything that educates more people is something they fear. Having people not being saddled with crippling debts after school only sends a message to others that maybe education is a path for them. The wingers don't want an educated citizenry.

[-] AngryRobot@lemmy.world 23 points 1 week ago

No, the gop has weaponized anti-intelectualism. The reds won't vote for a candidate that wants to make college affordable.

[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago

Indeed. The qons will call anyone with a degree an "elitist" [1], meanwhile, give the likes of Elon and the convicted felon, who are actual elitists, reacharounds. It's almost as if actual meanings of words mean nothing to them.

[1] This does not apply to their own kind, even if they were born rich AF and went to Ivy League school(s).

[-] DogWater@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

No? What do you mean? You agree with him.

[-] Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 week ago

I see you don't like "right wing" any more than I do, because I think they justify their actions by thinking "we must be right, we're the right wing." So I call them the Wrong Wing.

Or sometimes the Human-Rights-Destroying Wing.

[-] blarth@thelemmy.club 22 points 1 week ago

The DoE is already under attack. It’s part of Project 2025, and they’re laying the groundwork for it already. They’re going to work hard to ensure education is difficult to access and/or neutralized as much as possible.

No, democrats need to adjust their messages to people without a college education.

One of the things that makes Trump so popular is that he panders to people without much education.

[-] Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 week ago

A better-educated public is a net gain regardless who's running the government.

Better educated women are less trapped in abusive relationships, although it still happens, because they have better job prospects and better chance to get law on their side.

[-] allidoislietomyself@lemmy.world 63 points 1 week ago

Unfortunately no one hates women more than other women.

[-] WoahWoah@lemmy.world 40 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Article filled with examples of men expressing hatred and misogyny towards women

"Ayup, no one hates women more than other women!"

[-] inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world 23 points 1 week ago

You still can't deny that women do hate women here.

53 percent of women hate women with that additional 10 percent of young women that voted to hate women.

I mean I'm willing to give women as a whole a quarter as a condolence prize since they played themselves.

[-] Soulg@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 week ago

Sorry not allowed to acknowledge the fault of any woman, it's all men's fault in the end. /s

[-] Empricorn@feddit.nl 6 points 1 week ago

We thought we could bargain with and persuade "conservatives". They voted for this, they are okay with women dying in hospitals because the doctors can't legally intervene. The supposed "Pro Life" party. I wasn't okay with abortion early in my male, hetero, American, white, life but now I see. They are only pro-fetus. Once a child is born, Republicans don't care if they starve, if they have access to clean water, if they can afford food, if they have shelter, if they are raped, etc... Multiply that by about 100x if they don't have white skin.

"Conservatives" are almost as bad as MAGAts, and just as unreachable with reason, logic, and empathy. I don't have a solution, I'm just pissed off. And I'm far from the most-harmed people will be the result of this greed, racism, apathy, and hate. Sorry...

[-] Cethin@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 week ago

Inaccurate. 53% of white women who voted voted for this. A lot sat out and let it happen.

[-] eatCasserole@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

Or were pushed away by voter suppression and hopelessness...

[-] bungalowtill@lemmy.dbzer0.com -1 points 1 week ago

Where is oversimplification going to lead us one day?

Oh, it’s 2024, never mind then

[-] braxy29@lemmy.world -2 points 1 week ago

as i just said in another comment, it scares me to see this shit AGAIN.

this narrative is not making women any safer!

[-] inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Yeah, the truth certainly doesn't make women safer.

You really should talk to other white women about that.

[-] braxy29@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

which truth is that, that no one hates women like other women?

look at the current climate, i see a lot of woman-hating from all sides, including supposed allies on the left looking for a scapegoat. the oversimplified victim-blaming of dumping our president-elect at the feet of women (again) demonstrates very little understanding of gendered power dynamics and very little effort to build coalition.

to this i would add the threads blaming racial and ethnic minorities, the poor, and the poorly educated.

do you want less suffering in the world, or are you no better than the right in looking for someone to blame, and someone whose suffering you can enjoy because, "they asked for it, they voted for it, they deserve it?"

[-] inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

The truth is 53 percent of white women including 10 percent increase of young white women voted for the behavior. Behavior mind you were say on full force since 2016 and white women voted for again.

As for me, when I being a minority, when I voted for Harris, knowing full well who Trump and company, was looking to my back, didn't expect 53 percent of white women of stabbing me and other women in the back. And seeing as white women voted for more suffering so I'm going to enjoy the schadenfreude because I'm sure as hell tired of trying to bail the country out from the stupidity of Americans in general. If that makes me as bad as the right, I'm okay with that, at least I voted to not enable this behavior, unlike 53 percent of white women who literally voted for this behavior.

White women need to get there shit in order so fix your own shit before you get all huffy with everyone else who are tired of trying to save you from yourselves.

Again, you should talk to other white women about that.

this post was submitted on 09 Nov 2024
853 points (97.8% liked)

politics

19107 readers
3040 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS