Asklemmy

44122 readers

640 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

Open-ended question
Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

Lemmyverse: community search
sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
!lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

178

What's the dumbest way you've seen someone get fired? (lemmy.autism.place)

submitted 1 month ago by VirusMaster3073@lemmy.autism.place to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml

155 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Thorry84@feddit.nl 30 points 1 month ago (2 children)

This is usually done to keep things going as normal as possible for as long as possible. Once people start noticing something is wrong, the best people start looking elsewhere. Before you know it, not only is the company in financial trouble, but it can't recover because some of the best people left. At least one time I witnessed, the company was working on layoff plans and even limited bankruptcy, but at the same time negotiating with the investment firm that owned part of the company to get more money. If they got the money, everything would be fine. It wasn't till that fell through, they had to start laying people off.

[–] tias@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

As if the best people won't leave once the layoffs start

[–] Robust_Mirror@aussie.zone 3 points 1 month ago

Right but you're trying to avoid them leaving before that in case you get a win and don't need to make the lay-offs. If they leave earlier the win you're hoping for may no longer be enough to save you.

[–] qevlarr@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

Exactly. Companies are typically working on multiple conflicting scenarios because you don't know which it's going to be