107
What from r/atheism at the old place do we want to avoid here in c/atheism? (lemmy.world)
submitted 1 year ago by meldroc@lemmy.world to c/atheism@lemmy.world
93 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I'll start! There was a lot of absolutist rhetoric there that said things along the lines of "All Christians are terrible, horrible, no good, very bad people!" I think a little nuance is in order, no?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Xanthrax@lemmy.world 57 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Provide rules that require religious tolerance, while still allowing respectful criticisms of said religions.

Basically just avoiding the edge lord/ hate speech stuff.

Over at /r/nihilism we always had a similar issue.

Any posts that are critical of religion should be fact based and impartial as possible. Sources should be required.

As an example:

Posting a rant about how how you don't like Islam: [deleted]

Posting a link to a news article about the statistical rate of s**ual harassment in the catholic church: "A+"

(Just examples)

All that being said, I think we should more focus on how to live our lives positively and effectively. A lot of people perseve atheists as having no motivations/ being unreliable. I think we should try to overcome that image by focusing on progressing our own "beliefs", and spreading our message: "Life is what you make it."

We should also strive to be a safe place for recent refugees of different religious backgrounds. Not only should we be a place of open discussion and critical thinking, but a place of support and recovery. That's more my opinion, though.

I would love to see posts like:

"Tips on staying positive after recently losing your faith"

"Rebuilding a social network after cutting ties with toxic family"

"How to come out to your religious family as atheist"

"I recently came out as atheist and my family disowned me, what should I do?"

"What are some good movies you'd suggest for an atheist?"

"Here is some art I made as a social commentary on religion"

"Making eye contact during prayer"

Etc...

[-] MrMusAddict@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

Seconded.

I personally have adopted an "as long as it's not hurting anyone" view of religions for individuals and smaller local groups, but I recognize that there's a lot of factual hurtfulness that goes on systemically. That inherently will try and make this community devolve into intolerance, so there's a tricky balance of moderating intolerance and welcoming open conversations that I don't have the answer to.

[-] pizza_rolls@kbin.social 11 points 1 year ago

One thing to keep in mind is that some people are anti religion due to experience. There are a lot of religions that ARE hurting someone by fly under the radar.

For example, I always see people say Lutherans are chill. Look up LCMS, it's a literal cult. I grew up in it. There is a lot of abuse prevalent in it, ie teaching you how to hit your kid "correctly".

But then people who speak up about it are labeled as "intolerant" or "edgelords" because "but everyone else told me Lutherans don't hurt anybody!"

And even beyond that, there can always be specific churches within religions or denominations that are seen as "okay" that are abusing their power to hurt others. I am not going to go out and attack religious people or anything, but I'm also not about to be neutral on the subject when I know it opens up a world of potential abuse.

I am very against requiring religious tolerance, abuse victims require a place at the table.

[-] MrMusAddict@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago

That's a very good point that people's personal abuses play a key role in the intolerance of religion.

It's a very blurry line between enabling detriment via tolerance, and disabling an inclusive discussion environment via intolerance. And, I'm not sure where that line could be well defined.

If this Atheist community would be prone to being more tolerant, perhaps there could be forums specifically for ex members of different beliefs. For example, I know there was an Ex-Mormon community on Reddit.

[-] pizza_rolls@kbin.social 6 points 1 year ago

I mean, if you have to ban discussion of abuse and send abuse victims somewhere else to be "tolerant" then maybe.... You shouldn't be tolerant?

[-] MrMusAddict@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I think you may be misunderstanding. I'm not saying we should ban discussions of abuse in a misguided effort of tolerance (or at all). I'm saying that we should be careful of overgeneralizations, and that if people would like a space to overgeneralize, it should be on other communities.

[-] kent_eh@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 year ago

there's a tricky balance of moderating intolerance and welcoming open conversations

Where does not tolerating religiously motivated hatred and intolerance fit into that framework?

[-] MrMusAddict@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago

I would classify that as harmfulness that should not be tolerated. However only at an appropriate level of generalization.

Articles about an individual going extremist should be met with disappointment in the individual, and disappointment in a system that would foster that extremism. But to call the whole religion a group of extremists would be too far.

[-] sloppy_diffuser@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 year ago

When religion is used to strip away civil rights, I don't think those actions deserve tolerance. Those actions are supported by large populations who were indoctrinated by their regional religion with mythologies that promise a happy afterlife if the members follow their leaders. Efforts to limit education and crticial thinking are used to avoid followers from realising the grift for what it is.

I realise the above is a generalisation, but they are real concerns of mine. At what point is tolerance just complacence?

[-] Epicurus0319@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

I used to be one of those toxic circlejerkers on r/ as a newly-deconverted teen with no life, now as a more mature adult I’ve also adopted that more nuanced stance- a major reason why I left that sub a long time ago

[-] Galluf@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

What is the point of censoring the word sexual?

this post was submitted on 07 Jul 2023
107 points (91.5% liked)

Atheism

3984 readers
5 users here now

Community Guide

Archive Today will help you look at paywalled content the way search engines see it.

Statement of Purpose

Acceptable

Unacceptable

Depending on severity, you might be warned before adverse action is taken.

Inadvisable

Application of warnings or bans will be subject to moderator discretion. Feel free to appeal. If changes to the guidelines are necessary, they will be adjusted.

If you vocally harass or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathizer or a resemblant of a group that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of any other group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you you will be banned on sight.

Provable means able to provide proof to the moderation, and, if necessary, to the community.

 ~ /c/nostupidquestions

If you want your space listed in this sidebar and it is especially relevant to the atheist or skeptic communities, PM DancingPickle and we'll have a look!

Connect with Atheists

Help and Support Links

Streaming Media

This is mostly YouTube at the moment. Podcasts and similar media - especially on federated platforms - may also feature here.

Orgs, Blogs, Zines

Mainstream

Bibliography

Start here...

...proceed here.

Proselytize Religion

From Reddit

As a community with an interest in providing the best resources to its members, the following wiki links are provided as historical reference until we can establish our own.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Rhynoplaz@lemmy.world