For Agitprop purposes, I’m asking comrades to help aggregate any and all effortpost responses, critiques, or general thoughts that you have seen or written pertaining to yesterday’s U.S. election that you think have standalone value for discussion either online or IRL.

I made a post for that purpose here, and ideally it can be used not only for general discussion, but as a reference for well thought out responses in discussions about the election to save all of us some brainpower.

No shitposts please, as we’d like to highlight some comrades’ actual effort in constructing responses or analysis, but humor is 100% welcome to help make your point!

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Hohsia@hexbear.net 11 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Truly, how do they even do these polls in the clusterfuck state of information transversal? Landlines, text messages, online shit?

I would be very curious to compare the accuracy of polls pre-21st century to what we’re dealing with today

[–] MrPiss@hexbear.net 8 points 1 month ago

Truly, how do they even do these polls in the clusterfuck state of information transversal? Landlines, text messages, online shit?

Depends on the polls really. Mostly calling people and having nerds figure out the best way to call people. How many in this or that zip code and trying to keep track of the response rate. Online polls do happen but aren't as reliable because on the internet nobody knows you're a dog.

I would be very curious to compare the accuracy of polls pre-21st century to what we’re dealing with today

I would too. I remember on the 538 website they had the favorablility tracker for Trump/Biden and you could see other presidential terms. It seemed like there were barely any polls for like Truman so it was really blocky for the first few post war presidents. It probably just took time for people to get phones and for pollsters to get setup. Regardless, they were probably about as reliable if they had good methodology.