214
The single issue
(lemmy.sdf.org)
Welcome to politcal memes!
These are our rules:
Be civil
Jokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.
No misinformation
Don’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.
Posts should be memes
Random pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.
No bots, spam or self-promotion
Follow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.
This is why nobody can take you seriously. Harris is not engaged in the genocide, and Trump is on record as wanting Netanyahu, the actual architect of the Palestinian genocide, to finish the job. Harris is the VP of a different country, and the person who is Hitler in this analogy prefers her opponent.
And there's no way to reach your position through intellectual honesty. Your motives are transparent, and that is why you will fail.
So if we take moral responsibility for Harris's stance on Gaza, surely you will take moral responsibility for Trumps. Is that too far of a leap? I mean Harris isn't president. She doesn't dictate policy, yet. Her being responsible for the current situation is just as far removed as you being responsible for a Trump win.
More: The arms sales to Israel are dictated by Congress, not the president. The president has very limited ability to pause certain arms shipments to Israel.
House Republicans actually passed a bill which would prevent Biden from doing that pausing. That bill never made it to the floor of the Democrat-controlled Senate, and so Biden did pause certain arms shipments.
This is just misinformation. The president has the ability and arguably the obligation to halt arms transfers to Israel.
https://www.npr.org/2024/05/10/1250402819/biden-says-he-would-stop-weapons-shipments-to-israel-if-it-invades-rafah
If their hands truly were tied, they could still show more support for dissenters rather than constantly trying to ignore them or shut them down.
But as you have pointed out, the do have some options.
What responsibility? Harris is not responsible for anything genocide related right?
Similarly I have this advice: not voting for Harris does not mean you did not vote for Harris.
Pick a lane.
In two sentences you went from incredulous to batshit.
No, she's not. The vice president can only affect congressional spending if they're casting the tie breaking vote in the senate.
You've inverted honesty/dishonesty again, like a real comrade!
Get fucked.