172
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 30 Oct 2024
172 points (96.7% liked)
politics
19136 readers
3711 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Maybe she could disagree with him on genocide.
Fucking shill more. Jfc, how much do you want Trump elected? Talk about garbage...
Seems to me like she can't get elected with her position on Palestine. Maybe you are the Trump supporter.
No, she's electable, but there are an awful lot of fucking morons doing their best to get Trump elected by using shitty arguments like the genocide that he outwardly supports. Truly anyone that actually believes not voting or voting for someone else is the right choice is amongst the absolute dumbest people. No critical thinking abilities. Strawman arguments. Closeted love for fascists like Trump. Actual domestic terrorists spreading information trying to hurt America.
Scum of the earth, really.
I mean, look at your response bruh:
This is just word salad with no critical analysis. You want to accuse others of no critical thinking skills but this is all you have to offer. The facts is that Harris supports the same genocide Trump supports. And its losing her the election. She had the opportunity to take a different tact; she chose the wrong side of the issue that is proving to be the deciding issue in this election. So you can circle jerk that everyones an idiot but you, but the reality is, Kamala chose this path, and all of the data we have, and I do mean all of it, is suggesting that she make a big fucking mistake by not distancing her self from this.
So we had the opportunity to move Kamala on this issue over the last couple of months. I mean, we we're able to move Joe Biden to the back of the bus; moving Kamala should have been easy. But the reality is that she had enough sycophants with trump derangement syndrome willing to run cover for her that she didn't feel she needed to. And so she didn't feel the pressure to move her position on a deeply unpopular issue. And now she's fucking stuck with it and is probably going to lose because of it.
So at the end of the day, if you were providing cover for Kamala on this shitty position of hers, YOU are to blame if Trump takes the white house. Our only option was to force the candidate to take a better position on a deeply unpopular position. If you defended her in that position, you OWN this Trump presidency, in the identical manner that those who were INSISTING that we needed to stick with Biden would have owned that L as well.
No. Two options, Trump or Kamala. Trump had shared his desire to increase the genocide. That's wise than what's currently happening and what Harris has said. I'm disgusted by what's going on over there, but I also understand all of the other implications of this election. Making it about a single issue that neither candidate had publicly rebuked, and then being any voting in that is moronic.
You're rhetoric is consistently anti Harris. You are effectively campaigning for Trump. It's not word salad to reiterate that people that keep shilling for Trump and making strawman arguments are fucking idiots.
You do nothing but try your best to sway voters against Harris. Everyone sees it and calls you in your bullshit, but you double down. When everyone but the shittiest of people think that you're wrong, maybe you should look at the company your keeping. But, if you're cool supporting a rapist for president, keep up the good work.
You are the very reason Harris is struggling to win this election. A toxic, deranged, abusive, psychology. When she loses, we'll be pointing at you.
You might point at me, but the test of us will know is the bigots and racists rallying for a rapist, some under the guide of, "but the genocide" ignoring the obvious fact that Trump is worse.
I'm not trying to dissuade people from voting for Harris. What good did you jump through to come to the conclusion that I am why she's struggling? Lol. The backwards thinking in you is in-fucking-sane.
You: "Harris is bad and supports genocide. Literally the worst person ever"
Also you: "People that are out there supporting Harris despite her flaws are the reason she's struggling".
Do you read the words you regurgitate? Fuck what a dumb take...
I'm saying Harris supporting a genocide is costing her the election. She can/ could change policy any time.
Her apologists (you, and those in media) who are providing cover for her, have done major damage to her chances by refusing to be critical of her, and by being abusive to those who find the support of a genocide problematic.
You are 100% the problem. And my entire comment history will always be available to review. You being incapable of understanding what you are reading is a *you issue.
But what you wont be able to say, is that you weren't told what you were doing was a problem.
Lol ok. Keep up the good work, comrade.
Sorry, I'm not interested in aligning with those working towards a Trump victory.
Lemmy's centrists don't like that suggestion very much, do they?