18
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Eheran@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago

New processor with higher number beats older one with lower number. In other news, new day has higher number than previous day!

[-] Meruten@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 1 week ago

Yes, but 9000 non-x3d did not beat the older version and arguably was worse in some games.

It's sad, but your statement is not a given.

[-] Eheran@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

I mostly mock the stupid "obsolete". Even if it beats it, it will cost more and is less available.

[-] fulg@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

If this was a YouTube thumbnail, it would also have a stupid arrow pointing to it and a mind blown (or smiling poop) emoji. Maybe some fire too? Oh, a trash bin, of course!

Sad times…

[-] Eheran@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

You won't believe what this new processor did!

[-] DarkThoughts@fedia.io 2 points 1 week ago

That is also also not surprising. X3D cpus have been pretty strong for games. The regular processors are for people who do not need gaming performance.

this post was submitted on 08 Oct 2024
18 points (95.0% liked)

Hardware

552 readers
159 users here now

All things related to technology hardware, with a focus on computing hardware.


Rules (Click to Expand):

  1. Follow the Lemmy.world Rules - https://mastodon.world/about

  2. Be kind. No bullying, harassment, racism, sexism etc. against other users.

  3. No Spam, illegal content, or NSFW content.

  4. Please stay on topic, adjacent topics (e.g. software) are fine if they are strongly relevant to technology hardware. Another example would be business news for hardware-focused companies.

  5. Please try and post original sources when possible (as opposed to summaries).

  6. If posting an archived version of the article, please include a URL link to the original article in the body of the post.


Some other hardware communities across Lemmy:

Icon by "icon lauk" under CC BY 3.0

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS