201
submitted 21 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) by tonytins@pawb.social to c/tech@pawb.social

The guy who used Midjourney to create an award-winning piece of AI art demands copyright protections.

Excuse me while I go grab my popcorn.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] RobotToaster@mander.xyz 49 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago)

One of the reasons I like AI art is that it's pretty settled law that something produced by purely "mechanical" means can't itself have copyright, since copyright requires both originality and a human author.

It seems like a reasonably compromise, the AI was created by hoovering up the commons, so anything it creates should belong to the commons. I expect a lot of lobbying in the future to try and change it though.

[-] SlopppyEngineer@lemmy.world 19 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago)

And if AI work would be copyrighted by the "prompt artist" then all the artists whose work is in the training set can sue the prompter for profiting of their work without licensing fees. It would be a legal clusterfuck so it was pretty wise to side step the whole issue.

this post was submitted on 02 Oct 2024
201 points (94.7% liked)

Furry Technologists

1293 readers
405 users here now

Science, Technology, and pawbs

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS