3
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] toxic@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Not every piece of legislation needs to benefit you. It’s okay if others benefit and you don’t get hurt in the process.

[-] DukeSilver@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

That’s not the only reason to oppose this.

All Bidens solution does is take money from the tax payers to pay off the predatory lenders.

[-] nieceandtows@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

What solution do you propose?

[-] Sixofdiamonds@lemmy.fmhy.ml -1 points 1 year ago

Reep what you sow and pay your fucking loan back at the agreed terms at the time of signing.

Personal responsibility is a bitch. Only irresponsible people want loan forgiveness.

[-] Zippy@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago

I think it is down right greedy for those who will typically be the highest wage earners to get loan relief for the loans that will make them wealthy. Why not apply that to business loans as well?

It is particularly paid by those that will have lower wages so how can you say it hurts none?

[-] toxic@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

It’s funny how we can print and print money for decades, we can “invest” in private industries, give them loans with favorable interest rates, billions in grants, look the other way with regards to regulations, not block anti-competitive practices, but the second we try to help actual people directly everybody loses their shit.

Want to help the economy? That $10,000 (or $20,000) for Pell grant recipients might allow someone to save $300 more a month towards a house, a car, or spend it on goods and services. After 3 years, that’s money back in the economy rather than back to bank that have gotten plenty of help in the best.

[-] onionbaggage@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

Bruh. They literally just forgave all the PPP business loans.

[-] Zippy@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago

Two wrongs make a right? You ok with the next government taking bribes because Trump did it as well?

[-] 4am@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago
[-] wwaxwork@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

It means the people fighting against it are only fighting against it because they don't get anything from it and that maybe they need to stop and consider that not every piece of legislation needs to benefit them and them only.

[-] hglman@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

Ok, ok, let's just give everyone enough to pay off the largest student loan debt.

[-] Zippy@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

I am fighting against it because it only supports those that will become some of the wealthiest sector in the country at the cost to a segment that will be in the lower end of wealth. It is simply greed.

[-] robgami@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago

Hurt is a strong word but other people would be paying for that benefit.

It's not hard to imagine someone who decided to miss out on college and take the career penalty of lacking a 4 year degree just to avoid debt feeling like it's a bit unfair to have to help pay for other peoples degrees. People who made the decision to take on the debt.

Maybe it's would be a societal good overall but it's not like there isn't another valid side to the debate. Personally I think that money could be better targeted towards those in poverty whether they have student debt or not.

this post was submitted on 02 Jul 2023
3 points (80.0% liked)

politics

18870 readers
3731 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS