You must be one of the few that do not believe they should diversify

This is an incorrect read of what I said. I said I don't buy the assumption that Mozilla is diversifying into anything good:

If you believe this, you need to deal with the cognitive dissonance that comes from this, and explain the basis for why you believe in them while simultaneously believing in the opposite of them.

Unlike you, I provided explicit examples of bad diversification, where are your examples of the good?

You are surprised that you are supposed to back up your opinions and bring references to a discussion.