-20
submitted 1 month ago by jaaake@lemmy.world to c/usa@lemmy.ml

Nobody likes voting for the “lesser of two evils.” Casting a vote in favor of someone who is diametrically opposed to your viewpoint(s) absolutely sucks. The shitty reality is that we aren’t going to change the electoral process in the next two months.

If you don’t see either major candidate as a champion that you can support, it seems more beneficial to see it as selecting your enemy for the next four years. I would rather fight against someone that I have a chance of changing. At minimum I would rather protest against someone that I think has a lower chance of authorizing lethal force against a march that I attend.

Voting for a 3rd presidential candidate (or not voting at all), is letting someone else make that decision for you.

That said, we have got to get out of this constant cycle of only having two options. There’s too much money at a national level to start there. We’ve got to start local and get third party candidates into offices at a city level, then state, then national. It’s going to take a long time and it should have happened so very long ago. We can’t change the past, we can only change the future. The only time to start changing the future is in the present.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] jaaake@lemmy.world -5 points 1 month ago

That’s what happens when you don’t vote or vote for a third party.

[-] TheAlbatross@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 month ago

Yes, but they're not proposing that either.

this post was submitted on 22 Sep 2024
-20 points (30.8% liked)

United States | News & Politics

7216 readers
137 users here now

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS