159
submitted 1 month ago by Confidant6198@lemmy.ml to c/usa@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] GarbageShootAlt2@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 month ago

I think the money in more to get access

Access to what and for what purpose?

[-] TheFonz@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago

Access to influence policy and legislation. But they seem to get mixed results. There have been a few studies that looked at the actual effects of lobbying. I may have to dig around but i can track them down. It's very interesting because it upturned what my assumptions were about lobbying.

It seems they find candidates that are already somewhat aligned and work no push the scale further. Like, someone like Latimer wouldn't need a lot to push the scale in favor of AIPAC objectives.

It's very interesting to read up on this.

[-] GarbageShootAlt2@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 month ago

It certainly goes some way to explain why lobbyists buy politicians for pennies in the grand scheme of things, but ultimately you're saying the same thing with a different inflection.

[-] TheFonz@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Sort of. It's a mixed bag is what I'm saying. It's just not as impactful as we all imagine it to be. Some politicians are very corrupt obviously. But it's not this prevalent "corporations own congress" kinda thing.

this post was submitted on 21 Sep 2024
159 points (80.7% liked)

United States | News & Politics

7216 readers
137 users here now

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS