438
submitted 2 months ago by LWD@lemm.ee to c/firefox@lemmy.ml

sigh

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Rozauhtuno@lemmy.blahaj.zone 40 points 2 months ago

Don't ascribe intention where incompetence is enough.

[-] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 21 points 2 months ago

It's better to treat incompetence as maliciousness, than to treat maliciousness as incompetence.

The benefit of the doubt should only apply in the absence of a longstanding pattern of behavior to the contrary.

IMO Mozilla has run out of goodwill.

[-] aaaaace@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 2 months ago

IMO Alphabet has run out of goodwill by abusing their market dominance in a more overt way.

Looking forward to more aggressive action by FTC, note that tech donors have asked Harris for Lina Khan's removal as a quid pro quo.

[-] roguetrick@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

The key point is the courts only generally care about antitrust issues if they're adversely affecting the consumer, and alphabet is starting to get into that territory.

[-] aaaaace@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 2 months ago

Lina's got her radar pointed...

[-] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 months ago

Exactly

They are just good at burning money and getting nothing done

this post was submitted on 20 Sep 2024
438 points (96.8% liked)

Firefox

17951 readers
129 users here now

A place to discuss the news and latest developments on the open-source browser Firefox

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS