9
Why Europe, U.S., China & Russia are Not the Same for Latin America
(www.struggle-la-lucha.org)
News from around the world!
Please only post links to actual news sources, no tabloid sites, etc
No NSFW content
No hate speech, bigotry, propaganda, etc
Here's the full article:
As a guy from simple origins of Brazil, here's what i think: I'm not pro-american, pro-russuan, pro-chinese, you might say i'm slightly pro-eu. I don't think, we, latin american people should side with the russian, or chinese empire, i think we should seek each other, i think we should fight for a united and more powerful latin america.
The russians and chinese might not have colonized us, they might noy have destroyed our democracy for corporate interests, but they are the ones who kill people for thinking different from their odeal, the ones who invade other countries because of "reasons", they are powerful enough already, they don't need more puppets so they can control.
We should fight for expelling those powers who have exploited us for many years, and those who might want to do it, we should unite for true democracy, and the good of the latin american people, we should combat dictatorships like maduro's, develop, and open up countries like haiti for latam's development.
We might speak different languages, have different cultures, and hate each other based on football, but we are all brothers of the same cause.
This is a great take.
I know in Europe the EU is too capitalism oriented but it still connects societies with that similar spirit and values. It would be wonderful for the unity you speak of form on each continent, which could progress towards a more connected world.
Joining in peace and freedom is more valuable than totalitarian power to subjugate others.
The People's Republic of China has never invaded a foreign country in it's history, with the exception of Vietnam, and minor participation in anti-terror operations - alongside NATO - in Mali and Somalia.
The idea of China as a territorially expansionist, politically interventionist power is a myth. These are both directly against Chinese foreign policy; what their foreign policy actually is in writing and practice is to build trust and economic codependency with the de facto governments of anyone who will have them.
I was talking about russia, i'm sorry i wasnt clear
China does have occupation issues most famously with Tibet, Hong Kong, Taiwan (Republic of China) and other problematic situations
Kinda like Russia "not-invaded" (lol) but occupied Crimea in 2014.
(in addition to the whole situation of the residents under the regime but that's digressing)
Fair enough, thanks for the clarification