this post was submitted on 08 Sep 2024
118 points (96.8% liked)

World News

38305 readers
684 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] bl4kers@lemmy.ml 31 points 1 year ago (7 children)

I listened to an interview recently, I believe on BBC, where the interviewee said the biggest issue with peace talks is that the international community isn't able to trust Putin to keep his word on whatever is agreed upon. I hadn't considered that, but it makes a lot of sense and I'm not sure how that could change

[–] LarkinDePark@lemmygrad.ml 13 points 1 year ago

But Putin was they only party to the previous Minsk agreements who kept his word. Merkel and then Hollande admitted that they never had any intention of honoring the agreements.

[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 11 points 1 year ago

The international community being G7 countries accounting for 15% of world population. Nobody gives a fuck what the west thinks at this point.

[–] AFC1886VCC@reddthat.com 10 points 1 year ago

Russia won't be trustworthy until Putin and his fascist United Russia party are gone.

[–] TheOubliette@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago

Who was the interviewee?

[–] buddascrayon@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago

it makes a lot of sense and I'm not sure how that could change

It will change when the cancer finally kills that bastard.

[–] geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml -5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The same argument can be used in favor of Russia. NATO has invaded plenty of countries under false pretenses in the past. Both Russia and NATO do not have a reputation for keeping their promises.

[–] Miaou@jlai.lu 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Unironically yes, NATO members have invaded a lot of places, often in coalition with other member states.

[–] Crashumbc@lemmy.world -3 points 1 year ago (3 children)

That's like saying Canada is responsible for something Mexico did because they're both on the same continent...

NATO is purely a defense agreement.

[–] OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It is more like saying the axis is known to invade nations because its member states invade nations. Okay, sure, Germany and Italy invaded the soviet union but Japan didn't, you can't say they're not a defensive alliance /s