48
submitted 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) by WoahWoah@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world

As this recently updated article discusses, while extremely unlikely, given the way this timeline is going it's possible the electoral college ends in a tie. Nate Silver projects this as a .3% possibility.

Things to think about:

  1. Only about half of the states require their electors to vote for the person that won their state. Who are the electors? Generally no one you know.

  2. If there's a tie, the House elects a president and the Senate elects a VP. Sub-consideration: it is the composition of the House and Senate after the November election that makes those determinations.

  3. This would all technically be decided on January 6th. And you remember how that went last time.

Regardless, it's highly unlikely this will happen. Still, this would be utter and complete madness. There is literally a non-zero chance we have a Trump/Harris administration. 🤣

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] jordanlund@lemmy.world 16 points 2 months ago

Pay particular attention to the EC votes assigned by Congressional District in Nebraska and Maine.

In the event of a 269-269 tie, it would only take one faithless elector to flip the whole thing.

Faithless electors is a whole deal... Good novel on the subject here:

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_People%27s_Choice_(novel)

[-] WoahWoah@lemmy.world 9 points 2 months ago

I didn't even think about those two apportioned states. Yikes.

Novel sounds interesting, I've never heard of it.

[-] jordanlund@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago

Basic premise is there's an election and the winner dies before the Electoral College votes can be counted. So who wins?

Is it the VP candidate, who got 0 electoral college votes, or the other candidate who got some but less than 270?

[-] themadcodger@kbin.earth 4 points 2 months ago

Is there an answer to that? Or would that be another Bush v Gore?

[-] jordanlund@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago

Oh, man, it gets INCREDIBLY complicated.

From a purely Electoral College perspective, you have to have 270 to win. So it boiled down to the electors in each state.

But there aren't really any laws REQUIRING electors to vote for who their state wanted and, in the case of death, that's kind of out the window anyway.

If nobody gets to 270, it goes to the House where it's one vote per state.

[-] themadcodger@kbin.earth 4 points 2 months ago

Is there an answer to that? Or would that be another Bush v Gore?

this post was submitted on 30 Aug 2024
48 points (77.9% liked)

politics

19096 readers
1159 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS